I can probably guess the answer to this, but here goes anyway... I bought an ATI Radeon 9700 Pro a week ago, and in all my benchmarks, it's come up at best only a few fps faster than my old GeForce 3 Ti500. Here are my specs.
AMD Thunderbird 1.4GHz
MSI K7T266 Pro (MS-6380)
512Mb (256x2) PC2100 DDR
Visiontek GeForce 3 Ti500 64MB (Detonator 41.09)
ATI Radeon 9700 Pro 128MB (Catalyst 3.0)
Windows XP Pro SP1
DirectX 8.1
In UT2003 (with bots), Battlefield 1942 (solo on LAN), and NOLF 2 (first level), both cards performed almost identically at the same settings. (1024x768x32, "High" detail) I know the processor/mobo are somewhat archaic, and that the Radeon 9700 Pro is particularly dependent on the CPU power, but would a chintzy chip really bring ATI's speed demon <i>this</i> far into the ground? I just can't see how that could be.
I'm thinking about returning this Radeon 9700 Pro, but if all I need is a faster processor/mobo then I'll hang onto it, since I'm buying those soon anyway. Otherwise, I'll be more than happy to wait for the GeForce FX when it's released next Fall (accounting for Nvidia's inevitable delays, of course...).
Thanks in advance.
AMD Thunderbird 1.4GHz
MSI K7T266 Pro (MS-6380)
512Mb (256x2) PC2100 DDR
Visiontek GeForce 3 Ti500 64MB (Detonator 41.09)
ATI Radeon 9700 Pro 128MB (Catalyst 3.0)
Windows XP Pro SP1
DirectX 8.1
In UT2003 (with bots), Battlefield 1942 (solo on LAN), and NOLF 2 (first level), both cards performed almost identically at the same settings. (1024x768x32, "High" detail) I know the processor/mobo are somewhat archaic, and that the Radeon 9700 Pro is particularly dependent on the CPU power, but would a chintzy chip really bring ATI's speed demon <i>this</i> far into the ground? I just can't see how that could be.
I'm thinking about returning this Radeon 9700 Pro, but if all I need is a faster processor/mobo then I'll hang onto it, since I'm buying those soon anyway. Otherwise, I'll be more than happy to wait for the GeForce FX when it's released next Fall (accounting for Nvidia's inevitable delays, of course...).
Thanks in advance.