G
Guest
Guest
These benchmarks are from Maximum PC, and are displayed in the newest issue of PC Gamer. Just thought some of you benchmark freaks would be interested.
Keep in mind the card and drivers were early beta versions. Sorry if these are old, but they are REAL.
All tests done with Pentium4 3Ghz System. All tests ran at 1600X1200, 32bit color, 2X AA.
Quake III----- FX: 209fps-------R9700pro: 147fps
UT2003-------- FX: 140fps-------R9700pro: 119fps
3DMark2001SE(Nature)----- FX: 41fps--------R9700pro: 45fps
I dunno which one of the FX models was tested, but I'm kinda dissapointed in the 3DMark Score. I've got a feeling the 9700pro came really close or beat FX at a bunch of other tests not released. I hope the real card+drivers do better cuz these tests are from December most likely.
-I'm not stupid, I'm just big-boned!-
Keep in mind the card and drivers were early beta versions. Sorry if these are old, but they are REAL.
All tests done with Pentium4 3Ghz System. All tests ran at 1600X1200, 32bit color, 2X AA.
Quake III----- FX: 209fps-------R9700pro: 147fps
UT2003-------- FX: 140fps-------R9700pro: 119fps
3DMark2001SE(Nature)----- FX: 41fps--------R9700pro: 45fps
I dunno which one of the FX models was tested, but I'm kinda dissapointed in the 3DMark Score. I've got a feeling the 9700pro came really close or beat FX at a bunch of other tests not released. I hope the real card+drivers do better cuz these tests are from December most likely.
-I'm not stupid, I'm just big-boned!-