Here's a little secret for you: retail power supplies are rated at peak wattage, many OEM power supplies are rated at continuous wattage. I've seen this first hand, I had a Gateway 200W ATX power supply running 4 hard drives, 4 fans, a highly overclocked video card, a PIII 700@933, a SCSI card, a TV card, a CD-Rom, a CD-RW, and whatever other little things (RAM, etc). I had an Antec 250W crap out. Then I tried another Antec, it crapped out too. And a Generic 300W crapped out as well.
How is it that so many HP systems can run on 150w power supplies when many have fast processors, huge drives, and are able to support decent video cards? Easy, the power supply is able to deliver 150w on a full time basis.
Why would OEM's use "better" quality power supplies in "cheaper" component systems? Well, that depends on your definition of the word "better". But if you were selling a million systems a year, you could specify pretty much anything you wanted. You would DEMAND power supplies that could last through the warranty. If you were given the choice of a high quality 150w unit or a cheap 250w unit, and the garrunty that the 150w unit was durable enough to last 3 years in the stock system, but was told that the 250w unit could power MORE devices, but only for 2 years, being the kind of company that sells extended warranties, you'd probably go for the smaller rating 150W supply.
<font color=blue>You're posting in a forum with class. It may be third class, but it's still class!</font color=blue>