Archived from groups: comp.sys.palmtops.pilot (More info?)
Greetings,
Here's the scenario - I work in the field with my Palm or
my laptop with Palm desktop. My wife takes phone calls and
sets appointments for me at home with her PC with Palm desktop.
What is the best way to keep all three synched? When I bring
my laptop home, is there a way to synch it with my wife's PC
on my home network? A straight file copy won't work - she may
have updated her PC, and I may have updated my laptop. A file
copy could wipe records on one PC or the other. I need a true
synch solution between all three.
Archived from groups: comp.sys.palmtops.pilot (More info?)
Conrad <nospam@no_org.net> wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> Here's the scenario - I work in the field with my Palm or
> my laptop with Palm desktop. My wife takes phone calls and
> sets appointments for me at home with her PC with Palm desktop.
>
> What is the best way to keep all three synched?
Just sync your Palm to both of them. Unless the same appointment is
changed in two places, everything will just work. Conflicting changes
will result in both copies being kept, and you'll have to resolve it by
hand and sync again.
Archived from groups: comp.sys.palmtops.pilot (More info?)
In article <aranders-1506051726100001@192.168.1.103>,
aranders@insightbb.com says...
> Conrad <nospam@no_org.net> wrote:
>
> > Greetings,
> >
> > Here's the scenario - I work in the field with my Palm or
> > my laptop with Palm desktop. My wife takes phone calls and
> > sets appointments for me at home with her PC with Palm desktop.
> >
> > What is the best way to keep all three synched?
>
> Just sync your Palm to both of them. Unless the same appointment is
> changed in two places, everything will just work. Conflicting changes
> will result in both copies being kept, and you'll have to resolve it by
> hand and sync again.
>
Sync Laptop, now you have the Palm and LT synced, but nothing from the
PC.
Sync PC, now you have everything on the Palm, but the LT still doesnot
have the PC info.
Sync Laptop, now you are all synced.
--
Jim Anderson
( 8(|) To email me just pull my_finger
Archived from groups: comp.sys.palmtops.pilot (More info?)
On Thu, 16 Jun 2005 00:31:53 +0000, Jim Anderson wrote:
> In article <aranders-1506051726100001@192.168.1.103>,
> aranders@insightbb.com says...
>
>> Conrad <nospam@no_org.net> wrote:
>>
>> > Greetings,
>> >
>> > Here's the scenario - I work in the field with my Palm or
>> > my laptop with Palm desktop. My wife takes phone calls and
>> > sets appointments for me at home with her PC with Palm desktop.
>> >
>> > What is the best way to keep all three synched?
>>
>> Just sync your Palm to both of them. Unless the same appointment is
>> changed in two places, everything will just work. Conflicting changes
>> will result in both copies being kept, and you'll have to resolve it by
>> hand and sync again.
>>
>
> Sync Laptop, now you have the Palm and LT synced, but nothing from the
> PC.
>
> Sync PC, now you have everything on the Palm, but the LT still doesnot
> have the PC info.
>
> Sync Laptop, now you are all synced.
What I was hoping for, and I should have been more
specific, was a way to synch between two computers
running the Palm desktop. That would take three steps
down to two steps
1) Laptop <-> PC
2) Laptop OR PC <-> Palm
But on further thinking, that scenario is flawed - one
last synch is still required, since any of the three
machines involved may have new data, whichever machine
synchs with the Palm in my step two may still have
updated data from the palm that the other computer
doesn't have. The third synch is still required.
It very much looks like three machines, regardless of
the platform will require three synch operations.
This seems like it boils down less to a software
solution than a simple exercise in logic - a fox and
geese problem, if you will:
2 machines require one synch operation -
3 machines require three synch operations -
4 machines ... five synch operations??? -
5 machines - my head hurts. seven synchs?
n machines - anyone here got a formula?
Archived from groups: comp.sys.palmtops.pilot (More info?)
Think it goes something like this:
1 machine needs no syncs
2 machines need 1 sync
3 machines need 3 syncs
4 machines need 6 syncs
5 machines need 10 syncs
6 machines need 15 syncs
So guess it is n machines need "n(n-1)/2" syncs
FWIW
Dave
"Conrad" <nospam@no_org.net> wrote in message
newsan.2005.06.16.08.49.48.455776@no_org.net...
> On Thu, 16 Jun 2005 00:31:53 +0000, Jim Anderson wrote:
>
>> In article <aranders-1506051726100001@192.168.1.103>,
>> aranders@insightbb.com says...
>>
>>> Conrad <nospam@no_org.net> wrote:
>>>
>>> > Greetings,
>>> >
>>> > Here's the scenario - I work in the field with my Palm or
>>> > my laptop with Palm desktop. My wife takes phone calls and
>>> > sets appointments for me at home with her PC with Palm desktop.
>>> >
>>> > What is the best way to keep all three synched?
>>>
>>> Just sync your Palm to both of them. Unless the same appointment is
>>> changed in two places, everything will just work. Conflicting changes
>>> will result in both copies being kept, and you'll have to resolve it by
>>> hand and sync again.
>>>
>>
>> Sync Laptop, now you have the Palm and LT synced, but nothing from the
>> PC.
>>
>> Sync PC, now you have everything on the Palm, but the LT still doesnot
>> have the PC info.
>>
>> Sync Laptop, now you are all synced.
>
> Thanks, Jim. So the scenario is
>
> 1) Laptop <-> Palm
> 2) Palm <-> PC
> 3) Palm <-> Laptop
>
> or,
>
> 1) PC <-> Palm
> 2) Palm <-> Laptop
> 3) Palm <-> PC
>
> What I was hoping for, and I should have been more
> specific, was a way to synch between two computers
> running the Palm desktop. That would take three steps
> down to two steps
>
> 1) Laptop <-> PC
> 2) Laptop OR PC <-> Palm
>
> But on further thinking, that scenario is flawed - one
> last synch is still required, since any of the three
> machines involved may have new data, whichever machine
> synchs with the Palm in my step two may still have
> updated data from the palm that the other computer
> doesn't have. The third synch is still required.
>
> It very much looks like three machines, regardless of
> the platform will require three synch operations.
>
> This seems like it boils down less to a software
> solution than a simple exercise in logic - a fox and
> geese problem, if you will:
> 2 machines require one synch operation -
> 3 machines require three synch operations -
> 4 machines ... five synch operations??? -
> 5 machines - my head hurts. seven synchs?
> n machines - anyone here got a formula?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Conrad
>
>
>
>
Archived from groups: comp.sys.palmtops.pilot (More info?)
On Fri, 17 Jun 2005 14:49:05 +0100, Dave wrote:
> Think it goes something like this:
> 1 machine needs no syncs
Agree
> 2 machines need 1 sync
Agree
> 3 machines need 3 syncs
Agree
> 4 machines need 6 syncs
Disagree - given machines A,B,C, and Z, each containing
new data da, db, dc, and dz respectively:
1) A <-> Z
A has da, dz
B has db
C has dc
Z has da, dz
2) B <-> Z
A has da, dz
B has da, db, dz
C has dc
Z has da, db, dz
3) C <-> Z
A has da, dz
B haz da, db, dz
C has da, db, dc, dz (fully synched)
Z has da, db, dc, dz (fully synched)
4) B <-> Z
A has da, dz
B has da, db, dc, dz (fully synched)
C has da, db, dc, dz (fully synched)
Z has da, db, dc, dz (fully synched)
5) A <-> Z
A has da, db, dc, dz (fully synched)
B has da, db, dc, dz (fully synched)
C has da, db, dc, dz (fully synched)
Z has da, db, dc, dz (fully synched)
> 5 machines need 10 syncs
Disagree - I stand by my original number, 7.
> 6 machines need 15 syncs
Way too many - it can be done in 9 synchs.
> So guess it is n machines need "n(n-1)/2" syncs
> FWIW
> Dave
>
Back to formula school for you, Dave ;-)
Cheers,
Conrad
> "Conrad" <nospam@no_org.net> wrote in message
> newsan.2005.06.16.08.49.48.455776@no_org.net...
>> On Thu, 16 Jun 2005 00:31:53 +0000, Jim Anderson wrote:
>>
>>> In article <aranders-1506051726100001@192.168.1.103>,
>>> aranders@insightbb.com says...
>>>
>>>> Conrad <nospam@no_org.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> > Greetings,
>>>> >
>>>> > Here's the scenario - I work in the field with my Palm or
>>>> > my laptop with Palm desktop. My wife takes phone calls and
>>>> > sets appointments for me at home with her PC with Palm desktop.
>>>> >
>>>> > What is the best way to keep all three synched?
>>>>
>>>> Just sync your Palm to both of them. Unless the same appointment is
>>>> changed in two places, everything will just work. Conflicting changes
>>>> will result in both copies being kept, and you'll have to resolve it by
>>>> hand and sync again.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Sync Laptop, now you have the Palm and LT synced, but nothing from the
>>> PC.
>>>
>>> Sync PC, now you have everything on the Palm, but the LT still doesnot
>>> have the PC info.
>>>
>>> Sync Laptop, now you are all synced.
>>
>> Thanks, Jim. So the scenario is
>>
>> 1) Laptop <-> Palm
>> 2) Palm <-> PC
>> 3) Palm <-> Laptop
>>
>> or,
>>
>> 1) PC <-> Palm
>> 2) Palm <-> Laptop
>> 3) Palm <-> PC
>>
>> What I was hoping for, and I should have been more
>> specific, was a way to synch between two computers
>> running the Palm desktop. That would take three steps
>> down to two steps
>>
>> 1) Laptop <-> PC
>> 2) Laptop OR PC <-> Palm
>>
>> But on further thinking, that scenario is flawed - one
>> last synch is still required, since any of the three
>> machines involved may have new data, whichever machine
>> synchs with the Palm in my step two may still have
>> updated data from the palm that the other computer
>> doesn't have. The third synch is still required.
>>
>> It very much looks like three machines, regardless of
>> the platform will require three synch operations.
>>
>> This seems like it boils down less to a software
>> solution than a simple exercise in logic - a fox and
>> geese problem, if you will:
>> 2 machines require one synch operation -
>> 3 machines require three synch operations -
>> 4 machines ... five synch operations??? -
>> 5 machines - my head hurts. seven synchs?
>> n machines - anyone here got a formula?
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Conrad
>>
>>
>>
>>
Archived from groups: comp.sys.palmtops.pilot (More info?)
Yes you are of course correct.
So the formula is then (2n-3) syncs for n devices.
Dave
"Conrad" <nospam@no_org.net> wrote in message
newsan.2005.06.17.16.36.57.519137@no_org.net...
> On Fri, 17 Jun 2005 14:49:05 +0100, Dave wrote:
>
>> Think it goes something like this:
>> 1 machine needs no syncs
>
> Agree
>
>> 2 machines need 1 sync
>
> Agree
>
>> 3 machines need 3 syncs
>
> Agree
>
>> 4 machines need 6 syncs
>
> Disagree - given machines A,B,C, and Z, each containing
> new data da, db, dc, and dz respectively:
>
> 1) A <-> Z
> A has da, dz
> B has db
> C has dc
> Z has da, dz
> 2) B <-> Z
> A has da, dz
> B has da, db, dz
> C has dc
> Z has da, db, dz
> 3) C <-> Z
> A has da, dz
> B haz da, db, dz
> C has da, db, dc, dz (fully synched)
> Z has da, db, dc, dz (fully synched)
> 4) B <-> Z
> A has da, dz
> B has da, db, dc, dz (fully synched)
> C has da, db, dc, dz (fully synched)
> Z has da, db, dc, dz (fully synched)
> 5) A <-> Z
> A has da, db, dc, dz (fully synched)
> B has da, db, dc, dz (fully synched)
> C has da, db, dc, dz (fully synched)
> Z has da, db, dc, dz (fully synched)
>
>
>> 5 machines need 10 syncs
>
> Disagree - I stand by my original number, 7.
>
>
>> 6 machines need 15 syncs
>
> Way too many - it can be done in 9 synchs.
>
>> So guess it is n machines need "n(n-1)/2" syncs
>> FWIW
>> Dave
>>
>
> Back to formula school for you, Dave ;-)
>
> Cheers,
>
> Conrad
>
>
>> "Conrad" <nospam@no_org.net> wrote in message
>> newsan.2005.06.16.08.49.48.455776@no_org.net...
>>> On Thu, 16 Jun 2005 00:31:53 +0000, Jim Anderson wrote:
>>>
>>>> In article <aranders-1506051726100001@192.168.1.103>,
>>>> aranders@insightbb.com says...
>>>>
>>>>> Conrad <nospam@no_org.net> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> > Greetings,
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Here's the scenario - I work in the field with my Palm or
>>>>> > my laptop with Palm desktop. My wife takes phone calls and
>>>>> > sets appointments for me at home with her PC with Palm desktop.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > What is the best way to keep all three synched?
>>>>>
>>>>> Just sync your Palm to both of them. Unless the same appointment is
>>>>> changed in two places, everything will just work. Conflicting changes
>>>>> will result in both copies being kept, and you'll have to resolve it
>>>>> by
>>>>> hand and sync again.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Sync Laptop, now you have the Palm and LT synced, but nothing from the
>>>> PC.
>>>>
>>>> Sync PC, now you have everything on the Palm, but the LT still doesnot
>>>> have the PC info.
>>>>
>>>> Sync Laptop, now you are all synced.
>>>
>>> Thanks, Jim. So the scenario is
>>>
>>> 1) Laptop <-> Palm
>>> 2) Palm <-> PC
>>> 3) Palm <-> Laptop
>>>
>>> or,
>>>
>>> 1) PC <-> Palm
>>> 2) Palm <-> Laptop
>>> 3) Palm <-> PC
>>>
>>> What I was hoping for, and I should have been more
>>> specific, was a way to synch between two computers
>>> running the Palm desktop. That would take three steps
>>> down to two steps
>>>
>>> 1) Laptop <-> PC
>>> 2) Laptop OR PC <-> Palm
>>>
>>> But on further thinking, that scenario is flawed - one
>>> last synch is still required, since any of the three
>>> machines involved may have new data, whichever machine
>>> synchs with the Palm in my step two may still have
>>> updated data from the palm that the other computer
>>> doesn't have. The third synch is still required.
>>>
>>> It very much looks like three machines, regardless of
>>> the platform will require three synch operations.
>>>
>>> This seems like it boils down less to a software
>>> solution than a simple exercise in logic - a fox and
>>> geese problem, if you will:
>>> 2 machines require one synch operation -
>>> 3 machines require three synch operations -
>>> 4 machines ... five synch operations??? -
>>> 5 machines - my head hurts. seven synchs?
>>> n machines - anyone here got a formula?
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> Conrad
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>
Archived from groups: comp.sys.palmtops.pilot (More info?)
>On Thu, 16 Jun 2005 08:49:01 GMT Conrad <nospam@no_org.net> wrote:
>
>> It very much looks like three machines, regardless of
>> the platform will require three synch operations.
On Thu, 16 Jun 2005 13:13:40 +0000 (UTC), "Wayne S. Mery"
<wsm0@ns1.CC.Lehigh.EDU> wrote:
>Indeed. Or, truely cut it down to two data sources. Which you could
>potentially do if you put your calendar on a web host.
>
>Something to get you started:
> http://ask.slashdot.org/askslashdo [...] 3223.shtml
Or, a web-based calendar with sync supporting multiple Palms:
--
John Bartley K7AAY 503.326.2231...147
telecom syadmin, USBC-Oregon, Portland - Views are mine.
http://palmwireless.cjb.net Wireless FAQ for PalmOS(r)
Dilbert is a documentary.
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.