s/u/m/a platinium gf4ti4200se-8x vs c3d ati 9500

PoLo

Distinguished
Feb 14, 2003
1
0
18,510
Well first of all excuse me for my bad english but im spanish and i can´t remember all my english lessons =(

First the expecifications:
Platinium gf4 ti4200se-8x (s/u/m/a): agp x8, double cooler, mem 3,3 ns 550 mhz, 64mb only becouse 128 are missing =) and more expensive. Oc ti4400-4600.
http://www.suma.co.kr/english.html#

ati radeon 9500 (connect3d): Complete Microsoft® DirectX® 9.0 support, 128MB of DDR memory, 4-pixel pipeline architecture, 128-bit memory interface, Video output support, Supports the new AGP 8X standard, providing a high-speed link between the graphics board and the rest of the PC (2.0 GB/sec). Oc to 9700.
http://www.connect3d.com/products/products_radeon_9500.htm

Well rest of pc:
Pb epox 8rda+
mem corsair 512 pc 3200,xp 2100 (aiuhb),volcano 9,hd wd 80gb 8mb caché,dvd liteon...
Well, now wich & why? i think both are good but i don`t decide =( plz give me some opinion not benchmarks realistic things. thz.
 

phial

Splendid
Oct 29, 2002
6,757
0
25,780
........... my god theres a new thread every week on this...... "S E A R C H" for the topic your looking for.


9500pro is much, much better than the Ti4200.

the 9500pro will last you much longer because its based on new technology. it supports directx 9, while the TI4200-4600 only supports directx 8. also, the effects engine of the 9500pro is much faster, the pixel and vertex shader part. so, like, yeah
 

andlcs

Distinguished
Aug 4, 2002
401
0
18,780
It is not the 9500Pro version it is the 9500. However, I would get this Radeon 9500 over the Ti4200.

Even with the albatron Ti4200 card w/ 3.3ns memory reaching overclocked 700MHz+ and the GPU 300MHz+ (i don't know about SUMA card) much more than the 275/550 of this radeon. The cards may have close performance overclocked but the radeon have 128MB of ram and supports DX9.