Tom's Hardware > Forum > Games General > Games General Discussions > Camarilla threat: functional change?

Camarilla threat: functional change?

Forum Games General : Games General Discussions - Camarilla threat: functional change?

Tom's Hardware: Over 1.4 million members in 6 different countries available to answer all your high-tech questions. Sign up now! Its free!
Word :    Username :           
 

Archived from groups: rec.games.trading-cards.jyhad (More info?)

 

In the past LSJ has ruled that:

"Multiple discards in the same discard phase won't cost extra pool,
but multiple Camarilla Threat cards in play will stack."

the question was about Camarilla Threat and Dreams of the Sphinx, IIRC.

I was playing around in ARDB and noticed that Camarilla Threat's text has
changed from:

"Each Methuselah discarding a card during his or her discard phase burns one
pool."

to

"Each Methuselah must pay an additional pool to use a discard phase action
to discard a card."

Must have missed that. :s

Does this new text alter the interaction between CT and Dreams o/t Sphinx?
And for discarding with PB:LA the second discard phase action does cost
another pool, assuming you paid for the first discard phase action?

Sponsored Links
Register or log in to remove.

Archived from groups: rec.games.trading-cards.jyhad (More info?)

 

"Jeroen Rombouts" <jeroen.rombouts@NOSPAMpandora.be> wrote in message news:QanOd.7221$VW7.487554@phobos.telenet-ops.be...
> Does this new text alter the interaction between CT and Dreams o/t Sphinx?

Maybe. Clearly, the new text doesn't have any effect on DotS, so there
you go.

> And for discarding with PB:LA the second discard phase action does cost
> another pool, assuming you paid for the first discard phase action?

Each DPA costs extra when used to discard a card, per card text.

--
LSJ (vtesrep@white-wolf.com) V:TES Net.Rep for White Wolf, Inc.
V:TES homepage: http://www.white-wolf.com/vtes/
Though effective, appear to be ineffective -- Sun Tzu

Reply to Anonymous
Tom's Hardware > Forum > Games General > Games General Discussions > Camarilla threat: functional change?
Go to:

There are 1260 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Please mind

You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.

Add a reply Cancel
Sponsored links
  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
They won a badge
Join us in greeting them