with my 420, I get about 2664 points,on AMD Athlon "Thnderbird" 1.3GHz and 512MB PC100 RAM. In 3dMark2001SE @ default settings
<P ID="edit"><FONT SIZE=-1><EM>Edited by amdforce on 02/23/03 02:04 AM.</EM></FONT></P>
Look at the last guys scores. They are nearly identicle to the GeForce 2 MX scores. This is because the GF4MX420 is a GF2MX. Sad, no? I used to have a Cavalier, I called it a BMW-MX.
The MX440 is a revised GeForce2 GTS. It should be a bit faster as it uses faster memory. The MX460 is an overclocked MX440 and should be faster still.
<font color=blue>Watts mean squat if you don't have quality!</font color=blue>
GF4 MX440 is still a GF2 MX with LMA-II and faster memory. It has 1 pixel pipeline like GF2-MX, GTS has 2.
However, I was interested about 3DMark 2003 score of GF4 MX series cards, not 2001SE. Because they can run only 1 game test and I don't know how they perform.
<b> "You can put lipstick on a pig, but hey, it's still a pig!" - RobD </b>
Because it can only run one test, it is not in my interest to download 3DMark 03. This card runs the games that I do play fine. Such as MOHAA, Unreal Tournament, Deus Ex.
No, it's simply the LMA II.
Ever since the LMA, you could have low clock speeds and still win the competition. The geForce 3 Ti200 is many Hertz slower than a geForce 2 Ultra, yet it performs 10% better.
--
This post is brought to you by Eden, on a Via Eden, in the garden of Eden. <P ID="edit"><FONT SIZE=-1><EM>Edited by Eden on 02/23/03 03:55 PM.</EM></FONT></P>
My memory is getting really bad but I thought Geforce2 MX had two TMUs per pipe but only 2 pipes and SDRAM. Geforce4 MX440 has 1 TMU per pipe but it has 4 pipes and DDR SDRAM.
<b>[Update]</b>
Well, I was right with Geforce2 MX and wrong with GF4 MX which also has 2 and 2.
<b>99% is great, unless you are talking about system stability</b><P ID="edit"><FONT SIZE=-1><EM>Edited by phsstpok on 02/23/03 04:23 PM.</EM></FONT></P>