Should I get 32 bit or 64 bit?

Hello. I am a bit of a newbie, and am building a new PC. It will be an i7, probably 6GB ram (but may decide to go 12GB RAM) Primary function will be GAMES!

So, as the title suggests, should I go with Windows 7 32bit or 64 bit?

Add a reply

Register or log in to remove.

64bit for sure, if you go 32bit you will only be able to use about 3.5gb of that RAM and thats just a waste

Reply to dafin0

All new computers should go 64-bit, there's no good reason not to.

Reply to Dekasav

64 bit
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/64-bit

------------------------------ Intel i7 920, Gigabyte X58-DS4, 3x1 Corsair DDR3 1333, XFX 260 GTX
Samsung 750Gb F1,Samsung DVD-rw, Hiper Type-M 880W, Coolermaster HAF 932, Logitech Z-5500
Reply to hefox

If this thread gets derailed...

Message edited by randomizer on 08-20-2009 at 11:33:44 AM

------------------------------

http://i176.photobucket.com/albums/w179/random1301/1224237394448br8.jpg

Reply to randomizer

Absolutely 64 bit, otherwise almost half of that memory will be completely wasted.

Reply to sminlal

With that much memory, you will need to run a 64 bit version of the OS.

------------------------------ Which Chip? Well, it depends on which set of thieving b@stardz you choose to support: The ones who use insider trading to enrich themselves while running their company into the ground? Or the ones who illegally pay vendors to not support the first group?
Reply to Scotteq

No doubt about it... 64-bit.

------------------------------ Desktop: Windows 7 Professional 64-bit; Intel Q6600 CPU; E-VGA 780i SLI motherboard; E-VGA E-GeForce 8800GT; OCZ Vista 4GB dual-channel kit; Ultra X2 750W power supply; 2 x Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 500GB in RAID 0. Laptop: Acer Aspire 8730-6314;
Reply to Zoron

OK then, 64 bit it is. Placing my pre-order as we speak. But why 64 bit? Not that there is a price difference, but I've heard some rumours of driver issues with 64 bit.

Message quoted 1 times

Reply to asdf1234

The only issues are with old hardware. Since you're building a new computer, it should be nothing you have to be concerned with... unless you have a really old printer or scanner laying around.

------------------------------ Desktop: Windows 7 Professional 64-bit; Intel Q6600 CPU; E-VGA 780i SLI motherboard; E-VGA E-GeForce 8800GT; OCZ Vista 4GB dual-channel kit; Ultra X2 750W power supply; 2 x Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 500GB in RAID 0. Laptop: Acer Aspire 8730-6314;
Reply to Zoron

I do have an older printer, an Epson stylus photo. Works just fine in XP, I'll have to check their website I guess.

I was just concerned because there were quite a few topics where some poster was claiming that XP wasa all you need, and any more than 4 GB ram was a waste. As a hobby, I do like to process my own photos, and several people that I know said that the new photoshop loved RAM, the more the faster.

Message quoted 1 times

Reply to asdf1234

asdf1234 wrote :

I was just concerned because there were quite a few topics where some poster was claiming that XP wasa all you need, and any more than 4 GB ram was a waste.

Ah, now here we see the problems that habitat87 is causing...

To be fair to hab, there's a pretty good chance that more than 4GB of RAM IS a bit of a waste, at least in the sense that you may not notice very much of a difference in what you're running TODAY between, say, 4GB and 6GB.

But if you're buying an i7 system, that means 3-channel memory. So you basically have a choice between 3GB, 6GB, or (and this probably IS a waste) 12GB.

IMHO with RAM prices as cheap as they are today, it would be short-sighted to buy 3GB and install a 32-bit OS. Software abhors unused memory, and over time with new releases it grows to fill whatever RAM is available. Although you may not see much of a difference with the software you have NOW, I have no doubt that next year or the following year's games WILL be taking advantage of that memory. They'll do it because RAM will be cheap enough that every new system will come with 4GB at a minimum, and because the video game industry is competitive and will look for ways to use whatever hardware they can to make their games better.

So go ahead and buy 6GB and use a 64-bit operating system. You may not NEED it today, but if you keep your system for a year or two you WILL need it eventually. And it's so much easier to install the 64-bit OS now than to start with 32-bit and then have to reinstall and rebuild everything later on.

Message quoted 1 times

Reply to sminlal

sminlal wrote :

Ah, now here we see the problems that habitat87 is causing...

To be fair to hab, there's a pretty good chance that more than 4GB of RAM IS a bit of a waste, at least in the sense that you may not notice very much of a difference in what you're running TODAY between, say, 4GB and 6GB.

But if you're buying an i7 system, that means 3-channel memory. So you basically have a choice between 3GB, 6GB, or (and this probably IS a waste) 12GB.

IMHO with RAM prices as cheap as they are today, it would be short-sighted to buy 3GB and install a 32-bit OS. Software abhors unused memory, and over time with new releases it grows to fill whatever RAM is available. Although you may not see much of a difference with the software you have NOW, I have no doubt that next year or the following year's games WILL be taking advantage of that memory. They'll do it because RAM will be cheap enough that every new system will come with 4GB at a minimum, and because the video game industry is competitive and will look for ways to use whatever hardware they can to make their games better.

So go ahead and buy 6GB and use a 64-bit operating system. You may not NEED it today, but if you keep your system for a year or two you WILL need it eventually. And it's so much easier to install the 64-bit OS now than to start with 32-bit and then have to reinstall and rebuild everything later on.

Thanks for that... all my photo buddies use CS4 and swear that 6GB ram is the minimum I need, but my camera, while no slouch, has far fewer pixels then theirs. Most of them deal with 10 to 15 MB RAW images, I only need to deal with a 6MB RAW image. But even so, my present PC (core 2 duo with 2MB RAM) takes like 15 minutes just to load the image into CS3, and it can take me most of a day to crop, resize, whatever. I loaded one of my favourite files onto a friend's i7 with 12 GB RAM, and he cropped it, resized it and printed it before my old PC would have even finished loading it. That convinced me that I really needed to upgrade my system. Hence my questions, worries, etc.

Message quoted 1 times

Reply to asdf1234

32bit or 64bit, is this really a question?

Reply to zipzoomflyhigh

asdf1234 wrote :

But even so, my present PC (core 2 duo with 2MB RAM) takes like 15 minutes just to load the image into CS3, and it can take me most of a day to crop, resize, whatever. I loaded one of my favourite files onto a friend's i7 with 12 GB RAM, and he cropped it, resized it and printed it before my old PC would have even finished loading it. That convinced me that I really needed to upgrade my system. Hence my questions, worries, etc.

RAM is cheap, so I'd hesitate to say you shouldn't get plenty of it. And I'm not familiar with editing RAW files in Photoshop. But if it were me, then before spending my money I'd want to do a little more investigation to see whether the difference between your PC and your friends' is really due to the RAM, or if it might be due to differences in the CPU or disk throughput.

Reply to sminlal

Another thing is that you could get the 6 gigs now and 'try' out your system. Compare you system with your friend's like the speed of the hard drives, RAM..etc and see if you like how it works speed wise.

If not, as stated already, RAM is cheap, so then pop in another 6 gigs.

Reply to soundefx

Either way, 6 or 12gb with the I7 build, go with 64 bit OS. As others have pointed out, and looking at your friends rig that is already built, you can see what the advantage is. On some things it may be overkill, however with prices on Ram coming down everyday, it just is a good choice to go with 64 bit OS and more then 4 gb of ram if your building a new rig given the uses you have said your building a new one.

Reply to medjohnson77

asdf1234 wrote :

OK then, 64 bit it is. Placing my pre-order as we speak. But why 64 bit? Not that there is a price difference, but I've heard some rumours of driver issues with 64 bit.

The main reason to go 64-bit is because currently, 32-bit Windows only has enough address space to use 4 GB of memory total (that includes not just RAM, but also HDD cache, video card memory, etc.). So with 32-bit, you're probably looking at only 3-3.5 GB usable RAM. 64-bit increases this to a maximum that today we can only dream about (think 128 exabytes plus of memory, however much that is!).
I wouldn't worry too much about driver issues. But you can check your hardware manufacturers' websites to see if they have drivers available for any off-brand or old equipment, especially peripherals. Or, run the Windows 7 Upgrade Advisor; it will scan all connected devices for compatibility.
Good luck!

Reply to Bolbi

Focus On

Should I get 32 bit or 64 bit?

Forum Windows 7 : Should I get 32 bit or 64 bit?