Archived from groups: rec.games.frp.dnd (
More info?)
Nikolas Landauer wrote:
> Werebat wrote:
>
>>Are these little guys worth the +1 LA?
>
>
> More so than the hobgoblin.
(That said, IMC, to balance their
> shittiness for a +1 LA, I give hobgoblins one feat as a racial bonus
> feat, chosen from the fighter bonus feats list, Endurance, or a
> martial weapon proficiency; they still have to meet the prerequisites
> for the feat. For ease of DMing, I just assume that mook non-warriors
> choose a martial weapon proficiency, and mook Wars choose Endurance.)
As someone who will be running an Eberron campaign eventually, I like
this idea. BTB hobgobs are pretty lame.
>>They look like they'd make very effective rogues...
>
>
> That they do: +2 Dex, +2 Con, Small, 30' move, +3 NA, +4 Balance, +4
> Jump, +5 Hide (chameleon skin), Poison Use for free, low-light vision,
> and hold breath. Their only downside is the Small size (which tends
> to be a wash, IME, especially with no Str penalty) and the -2 Cha.
> With FC: Ranger, that lets a core Poison Dusk take a single level of
> ranger with no penalty, to get a favored enemy, track, wild empathy,
> proficiency with all martial weapons (including net and bola, through
> familiarity) and access to some druidic magic items with no UMD check
> required.
Or two levels of Ranger for free TWF feat!
> Overall, I think they're worth the +1 LA, and certainly a feasible
> alternative rogue (to a human, halfling or changeling) for a non-urban
> game.
True that. I'm thinking of running a game set in Q'Barra, so I'm doing
my research. :^)
- Ron ^*^