Microsoft to Allow Win 7 Downgrades to Vista, XP

Status
Not open for further replies.
G

Guest

Guest
Thank Goodness! Something good this morning Microsoft. Good job.
 

thedipper

Distinguished
Mar 3, 2009
97
0
18,630
I fail to understand why Microsoft is still allowing people to move to an old OS that's no longer a benefit to consumers.

Businesses should be able to use XP, but I believe a consumer should not. Really, it's just ending up being an extra driver that needs to be written for everything, and that slows down driver releases.

Preventing people from using XP would be promoting education and thinking for one's self. 2 things most of the world just can't muster anymore.

Learn the OS, don't trash it based on hearsay.
 

hairycat101

Distinguished
Jul 7, 2007
895
0
18,980
[citation][nom]thedipper[/nom]I fail to understand why Microsoft is still allowing people to move to an old OS that's no longer a benefit to consumers.Businesses should be able to use XP, but I believe a consumer should not. Really, it's just ending up being an extra driver that needs to be written for everything, and that slows down driver releases. Preventing people from using XP would be promoting education and thinking for one's self. 2 things most of the world just can't muster anymore. Learn the OS, don't trash it based on hearsay.[/citation]

That's right! To hell with choice! We should force those lowly scum bag consumers to do what they're told!

Second thought... this isn't China or cuba or some other dictatorship... is it?
 

trinix

Distinguished
Oct 11, 2007
197
0
18,680
I'd agree with you all that xp should be put to rest, if M$ would just stop changing the UI everytime.

Most users aren't waiting for another change in the UI. It's a good thing they didn't change too much from the vista look, but vista look already scares a few people. Others don't see an advantage to the eyecandy vista is offering and would rather use the XP interface. Not just or not even for speed of the system, but just because they are used to it.

imho same with the office. M$ keeps forcing new UI's we don't want, some might, but some really don't. This is just a way they try to prevent users from pirating old xp cd's or changing to linux, not that a lot will change to linux yet.
 

Maxor127

Distinguished
Jul 16, 2007
804
0
18,980
Yeah, it's kind of getting annoying how some people just can't let go of XP and Microsoft keeps catering to them to hold software technology back. XP had a good run, but it's over. I don't want to hear another two years about how much better XP is than Windows 7.
 

hairycat101

Distinguished
Jul 7, 2007
895
0
18,980
I agree totally that MS needs to stop forcing a change in UI. At least they should have a "clasic interface" so that if we don't like the new UI we can still use newer products with some level of comfort. I really don't understand why they don't have a "clasic" view their new products. Vista can be made to look a lot like XP. It takes some doing, but it is possible. The new office is HORRIBLE!!! It has no options to look like 2003 or earlier. Why they did that makes no since whatsoever.
 

A Stoner

Distinguished
Jan 19, 2009
326
105
18,960
[citation][nom]thedipper[/nom]I fail to understand why Microsoft is still allowing people to move to an old OS that's no longer a benefit to consumers.[/citation]
I fail to understand why people like you have to think that one size fits all. Why do we have trucks when people can drive cars, why have cars when people can use motorcycles, why have motorcycle when people can simply walk around? Sorry, but Windows Vista does not in any way shape or form benifit me as a customer. I do not want alot of stress from using my computer, and I have to say, the nagging nanny software that Microsoft put together called Windows Vista is just that, a nagging nanny that stresses me out for any and all tasks. Setting up network, a pain the the ass. Installing programs, a pain in the ass. Finding the simplest of task programs, a pain in the ass. The search, another pain. UAC, do not even get me started on how much a LOATHE that feature. Windows 7, no matter how much your devotion to your releigion of loving it is, does not much improve on Vista. UAC still there, same search feature, same layout for trying to configure your network settings. Same nagging nanny questions everytime you try to install a program, run a program or change any setting on the computer that marginally affects the "system". Go buy your copy of Vista and Windows 7 and stop your moaning about how, because you are happy with it, everyone MUST comply.
 

Tedders

Distinguished
Jan 23, 2009
186
0
18,680
I can half-way understand downgrading to XP. People dont want to downgrade to Vista. Now, I think they should only do this for the first year or so of 7 being out. After that, its Windows 7 only... unless they screw it up like Vista (hope not).
 

zak_mckraken

Distinguished
Jan 16, 2004
1,592
0
19,780
[citation][nom]hairycat101[/nom]That's right! To hell with choice! We should force those lowly scum bag consumers to do what they're told! [/citation]

I think Microsoft have all the rights to decide if or not they should continue to offer and support XP (or Vista, for that matter). However, they certainly can't stop anyone with a legal retail version of XP to install it on their new machine though. It's their software after all.

If want freedom of choice, buy yourself a retail version or go Linux.
 

jrsdav

Distinguished
Apr 7, 2009
27
0
18,530
I work for a company that puts out a large number of downgraded machines every week, and this is slightly disapointing news. The Microsoft downgrade program is so full of flaws it actually becomes an ineffective way to do business. Especially if you are a smaller computer retailer and do not want to go through the headache of being certified as a Microsoft "Gold" Partner.

If you are a Gold Partner, you receive a key that enables you to do as many downgrades as you like without the fear of "I'm sorry, we could not verify this installation". I won't go into details about the other alternative for those who aren't Gold status, but I will say it is very arduous and time consuming.

My only hope is they figure out a better protocol for retailers, making the service a more effective business tool for retailers.
 

tenor77

Distinguished
Jan 22, 2009
711
0
18,980
This is a good and a bad. I love XP. It's been a great ride, but it's nearing the end of its usefullness. It's time to move on, time for 64bit to come to the forefront and time for a new design for .Net. The problem is we're going to loose some compatibility for some older software, but if we stay stagnant that's just more software that will become obsolete sooner rather than later.

Just my opinion.
 

eklipz330

Distinguished
Jul 7, 2008
3,034
19
20,795
i find no reason to not upgrade to win 7 because in this day and age with all the system resources unused and available, they might as well put it to use for something right? i mean in a year or two, 12gb ram will be standard, and quad core is pretty much the standard already. ssd's are blazing fast, and video cards don't hiccup as much as they used to.

i mean theres no reason to upgrade unless your still using parts from '04 and have no spare cash to upgrade... than you probably won't have spare cash to buy the OS anyhow.
 

thedipper

Distinguished
Mar 3, 2009
97
0
18,630
[citation][nom]lutel[/nom]You mean UPGRADES to XP. Any system without DRM is UPGRADE to vista/7.[/citation]
If only you knew what DRM in an OS even does...
 

deltatux

Distinguished
Jul 29, 2008
335
0
18,780
Sounds like they are taking the Sony approach. Continue selling their older products along with the newer products just in case people don't like the newer products but hope to not cannabalize their new products' sales.
 

curnel_D

Distinguished
Jun 5, 2007
741
0
18,990
" The spokesperson went on to detail that this would not the first time that Microsoft has offered downgrade rights to a version other than its immediate predecessor "

You missed a word.
 

seboj

Distinguished
Mar 31, 2008
403
0
18,790
[citation][nom]deltatux[/nom]Sounds like they are taking the Sony approach. Continue selling their older products along with the newer products just in case people don't like the newer products but hope to not cannabalize their new products' sales.[/citation]

Right idea, but I don't think they care about cannibalization. They're in it for market share.

[citation][nom]A Stoner[/nom]I fail to understand why people like you have to think that one size fits all. Why do we have trucks when people can drive cars, why have cars when people can use motorcycles, why have motorcycle when people can simply walk around? Sorry, but Windows Vista does not in any way shape or form benifit me as a customer. I do not want alot of stress from using my computer, and I have to say, the nagging nanny software that Microsoft put together called Windows Vista is just that, a nagging nanny that stresses me out for any and all tasks. Setting up network, a pain the the ass. Installing programs, a pain in the ass. Finding the simplest of task programs, a pain in the ass. The search, another pain. UAC, do not even get me started on how much a LOATHE that feature. Windows 7, no matter how much your devotion to your releigion of loving it is, does not much improve on Vista. UAC still there, same search feature, same layout for trying to configure your network settings. Same nagging nanny questions everytime you try to install a program, run a program or change any setting on the computer that marginally affects the "system". Go buy your copy of Vista and Windows 7 and stop your moaning about how, because you are happy with it, everyone MUST comply.[/citation]

Learn to use a computer.

[citation][nom]hairycat101[/nom]I agree totally that MS needs to stop forcing a change in UI. At least they should have a "clasic interface" so that if we don't like the new UI we can still use newer products with some level of comfort. I really don't understand why they don't have a "clasic" view their new products. Vista can be made to look a lot like XP. It takes some doing, but it is possible. The new office is HORRIBLE!!! It has no options to look like 2003 or earlier. Why they did that makes no since whatsoever.[/citation]

MS is selling a product. That's their business. If you don't like the product, use a different one.

If you want to degrade to a product that's older and inferior to their current offering, that's fine by them. Whatever it takes to keep you on the bus. MS would rather you keep using Windows, regardless of whether it's XP, Vista, Win7, etc, as long as you're not switching to Linux or OSX.

 

jsloan

Distinguished
Sep 24, 2008
444
0
18,780
i guess everyone is not convinced about windows 7, maybe the big guys evaluated it, saw vista, or too much vista and balked so microsoft is still stuck with vista around it's neck, or as i like to say it maybe some of the windows 7 lipstick has come off the windows vista pig... ;-)
 

A Stoner

Distinguished
Jan 19, 2009
326
105
18,960
[citation][nom]seboj[/nom]Learn to use a computer.[/citation]
Learn to give criticism.

Let me see if I get your position correct. Because I do not desire to spend an additional 12 hours learning how to configure a new operating systems network settings, I do not know how to use a computer? Does this mean because someone does not work in C++, oracle, .NET, cannot do CGM, CG, knows how to bypass DRM or any other single ability of a computer that they do not know how to use a computer? I do just fine than you very much, and I perfer to do it in XP rather than Vista.

You on the other hand, likely because you cannot put a coherent argument forward, just reduce it to; "learn to use a computer"?

I have a coherent group of complaints about what Microsoft did with their software, and I will or will not buy it based on it's qualities. The fact that XP will be an option in the future assures that my copy will remain an effective tool for at least another two years, and likely closer to three, when Microsoft will once again be putting out a new version of it's operating system. Once again, at that time, or maybe even by the time they release Windows 7 or it's first service pack, it will have been modified to be more user friendly and I will give them some of my money for their valuable to me product. It has nothing to do with my ability to use a computer, it has everything to do with how much I am willing to invest in learning the tricks and hacks of the new operating system, in the case of Vista and it seems Windows 7, how much I am willing to suffer though multiple questions of whether I am sure I want to do what I want to do. These are ligitimate concerns I have with the software, none of your trash talk is going to convince me otherwise, nor is anyone elses trash talk going to. What would be usefull though was if you put up or shut up on your statements. If, I supposedly do not know how to use a computer, then maybe you could give me some of those tricks, hacks and other missing ingredients I am missing that would turn the worthless to me software into a gem I can use simply and with much less frustration. Since none of you Vista/7 fan bois are going to do so, or even more to the point able to provide this information because it does not exist, I kindly ask that you just shut up and stop defending the undefensable.
 
[citation][nom]hairycat101[/nom]That's right! To hell with choice! We should force those lowly scum bag consumers to do what they're told! Second thought... this isn't China or cuba or some other dictatorship... is it?[/citation]

What you say is dictatorship.

Allowing the use of a 10 year old OS will NOT stiumlate the innovative minds of programmers. Why program better things when there's that old clunky OS that people alway go for, and seem to ignore the latest?

By your logic, we should still be selling analog phones. And vacuum tube computers. Not to mention Window 95, because hey, it runs fast!

Let XP die. It has outlived itself.
 
[citation][nom]A Stoner[/nom]I fail to understand why people like you have to think that one size fits all. Why do we have trucks when people can drive cars, why have cars when people can use motorcycles, why have motorcycle when people can simply walk around? Sorry, but Windows Vista does not in any way shape or form benifit me as a customer. I do not want alot of stress from using my computer, and I have to say, the nagging nanny software that Microsoft put together called Windows Vista is just that, a nagging nanny that stresses me out for any and all tasks. Setting up network, a pain the the ass. Installing programs, a pain in the ass. Finding the simplest of task programs, a pain in the ass. The search, another pain. UAC, do not even get me started on how much a LOATHE that feature. Windows 7, no matter how much your devotion to your releigion of loving it is, does not much improve on Vista. UAC still there, same search feature, same layout for trying to configure your network settings. Same nagging nanny questions everytime you try to install a program, run a program or change any setting on the computer that marginally affects the "system". Go buy your copy of Vista and Windows 7 and stop your moaning about how, because you are happy with it, everyone MUST comply.[/citation]

If you can't do something as simple as turn the UAC off, or take the Vista skin off, or do a simple Start > Computer > Properties > Advanced > Settings and optimize for performance, you shouldn't be on this board. Not at all.

One size does not fit all. That's why MS kept legacy support and various skins for Vista to use. Not to mention the 7 different SKUs.

You're the one that needs to get your head out of the sand. Do you want to continue using XP in 2020? Way to go, you stifled a whole generation of programmers.
 
G

Guest

Guest
ofcourse we can!
First we'll need to buy a 370$ Win7 licence. Then a downgrade pack of $80!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.