GF4 MX-440-8X VS Radeon 9000 NON-Pro

[vk2amv]

Hi,
I have here 2 cards. I have my original video card which I am currently using.
Gigabyte Maya Radeon 9000 NON-Pro 64Meg
And I have one I bought for a secondary machine
Daytona GeForce 4 MX440-8X 64Meg
Now I have been looking at the benchmarks and I have noticed that the 9000 wins some and the MX440 wins some others. Contary to what I was expecting. I wasnt expecting the GF4 MX440 to even touch the R9000. So now I want to know other peoples opinions which card would be better in my main machine the Radeon or the GeForce. And yes I do know the GF is only an overclocked GF2. But does the MX440 have much overclocking room left? I know the Radeon doesnt.
Thanks
AREA_51

'It's only when you look at an ant through a magnifying glass on a sunny day that you realise how often they burst into flames'

 

[Spitfire_x86]

MX440-8X usually is better than R9000 non-Pro in DX7 games.

MX440 (standarrd, not 8X)and R9000 non-Pro tie in DX7 games.

Someday Microsoft will use safedisc copy protection on Windows, and we have to insert the Windows CD evertime we boot pc.

<b><A HREF="http://geocities.com/spitfire_x86" target="_new"> My Rig</A></b>

 

[Nights_L]

R9000 supports for DX8, that's the advantage I know from R9000 when you play DX8 games, otherwise, games supports DX7, GF4MX will lead
there is no much room left, but you can still try to overclock it

 

[Spitfire_x86]

I own this card, this R9000 has no active cooling (cheap alluminium heatsink), 5 ns memory, no memory heatsink. I don't know, how it can be overclocked without frying the card

Someday Microsoft will use safedisc copy protection on Windows, and we have to insert the Windows CD evertime we boot pc.

<b><A HREF="http://geocities.com/spitfire_x86" target="_new"> My Rig</A></b>

 

[Nights_L]

I had that card before
I still overclocked it a bit, from 250 to 260 or sth, I forgot
I was only able to oc the memory a little bit, (forgot how much)
all of this of course, without spending 1$, cuz I have no money =P