a few weeks ago, i pointed out that the 9500pro has vastly superior performance when rendering DirectX9 effects. the problem was i couldnt remember where i had found this information
<A HREF="http://www.hardocp.com/image.html?image=MTA1MDI2NTI3OHViYWF1RTBZM3lfNl8zX2wuZ2lm" target="_new">Shadermark Test of the 9600pro, 9500pro and GFFX 5600ultra</A>
half way down, some tests are turning out 170FPS on teh 9500pro, and only 30 on the GFFX!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
this, i dont have words to discribe whati think. its SICK. discusting, totally absolutely WRONG.
How can Nvidia sell this product claiming that it has superior performance and features, when its top of the line card cant even compete with ATI's value cards?
IMO, there should be a story on Marketplace or some other TV show that points out the companies that are taking advantage and stealing from consumers
-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-
<A HREF="http://www.xgr.com" target="_new">XGR-Game Reviews</A>
My friends Gaming Review Site. Check it out.
*i was the one playing UT2003 in teh review heh heh* "feels important"
<A HREF="http://www.hardocp.com/image.html?image=MTA1MDI2NTI3OHViYWF1RTBZM3lfNl8zX2wuZ2lm" target="_new">Shadermark Test of the 9600pro, 9500pro and GFFX 5600ultra</A>
half way down, some tests are turning out 170FPS on teh 9500pro, and only 30 on the GFFX!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
this, i dont have words to discribe whati think. its SICK. discusting, totally absolutely WRONG.
How can Nvidia sell this product claiming that it has superior performance and features, when its top of the line card cant even compete with ATI's value cards?
IMO, there should be a story on Marketplace or some other TV show that points out the companies that are taking advantage and stealing from consumers
-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-
<A HREF="http://www.xgr.com" target="_new">XGR-Game Reviews</A>
My friends Gaming Review Site. Check it out.
*i was the one playing UT2003 in teh review heh heh* "feels important"