Archived from groups: rec.games.trading-cards.jyhad (More info?)
Caliban bleeds
Krassimir blocks and plays Internal Recursion for the presence ability:
"This blocking vampire can end combat as a strike during the resulting
combat. If he or she does so and the acting minion is an ally or a younger
vampire, this blocking vampire untaps."
Caliban strikes hands
Krassimir ends combat
Caliban plays Telepathic Tracking at superior: "Only usable when both
combatants are still ready and combat is about to end (with no uncanceled
press to continue). Combat does not end; another round starts."
Since Internal Recursion just says "can end combat as a strike during the
resulting combat" can Krassimir again end combat in the next round?
Or is this an example of "During X do Y" so that Krassimir can only once end
combat.
Archived from groups: rec.games.trading-cards.jyhad (More info?)
Name wrote:
> Caliban bleeds
> Krassimir blocks and plays Internal Recursion for the presence ability:
> "This blocking vampire can end combat as a strike during the resulting
> combat. If he or she does so and the acting minion is an ally or a younger
> vampire, this blocking vampire untaps."
> Caliban strikes hands
> Krassimir ends combat
> Caliban plays Telepathic Tracking at superior: "Only usable when both
> combatants are still ready and combat is about to end (with no uncanceled
> press to continue). Combat does not end; another round starts."
>
> Since Internal Recursion just says "can end combat as a strike during the
> resulting combat" can Krassimir again end combat in the next round?
>
> Or is this an example of "During X do Y" so that Krassimir can only once end
> combat.
Um.
The former.
Sure.
And have him send me a postcard when it happens, OK?
:-)
--
LSJ (vtesrepSPAM@TRAPwhite-wolf.com) V:TES Net.Rep (remove spam trap to reply)
Links to V:TES news, rules, cards, utilities, and tournament calendar:
http://www.white-wolf.com/vtes/
Archived from groups: rec.games.trading-cards.jyhad (More info?)
"LSJ" <vtesrepSPAM@TRAPwhite-wolf.com> wrote in message
news:7n3Ye.1850$QE1.218@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.net...
> Name wrote:
>> Caliban bleeds
>> Krassimir blocks and plays Internal Recursion for the presence ability:
>> "This blocking vampire can end combat as a strike during the resulting
>> combat. If he or she does so and the acting minion is an ally or a
>> younger
>> vampire, this blocking vampire untaps."
>> Caliban strikes hands
>> Krassimir ends combat
>> Caliban plays Telepathic Tracking at superior: "Only usable when both
>> combatants are still ready and combat is about to end (with no uncanceled
>> press to continue). Combat does not end; another round starts."
>>
>> Since Internal Recursion just says "can end combat as a strike during the
>> resulting combat" can Krassimir again end combat in the next round?
>>
>> Or is this an example of "During X do Y" so that Krassimir can only once
>> end
>> combat.
>
> Um.
> The former.
> Sure.
>
> And have him send me a postcard when it happens, OK?
>
> :-)
>
"Him"? Surely not a reversal of the epochal Krassimir's gender ruling?
Archived from groups: rec.games.trading-cards.jyhad (More info?)
LSJ <vtesrepSPAM@TRAPwhite-wolf.com> wrote in message
news:7n3Ye.1850$QE1.218@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.net...
> > Since Internal Recursion just says "can end combat as a strike during
the
> > resulting combat" can Krassimir again end combat in the next round?
> >
> > Or is this an example of "During X do Y" so that Krassimir can only once
end
> > combat.
>
> Um.
> The former.
> Sure.
>
> And have him send me a postcard when it happens, OK?
>
> :-)
Okay, one metaphorical postcard is in the mail. This actually just happened
tonight.
Archived from groups: rec.games.trading-cards.jyhad (More info?)
"LSJ" <vtesrepSPAM@TRAPwhite-wolf.com> wrote in message
news:7n3Ye.1850$QE1.218@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.net...
>
> Name wrote:
>
>> Caliban bleeds
>> Krassimir blocks and plays Internal Recursion for the presence ability:
>> "This blocking vampire can end combat as a strike during the resulting
>> combat. If he or she does so and the acting minion is an ally or a
>> younger
>> vampire, this blocking vampire untaps."
>> Caliban strikes hands
>> Krassimir ends combat
>> Caliban plays Telepathic Tracking at superior: "Only usable when both
>> combatants are still ready and combat is about to end (with no uncanceled
>> press to continue). Combat does not end; another round starts."
>>
>> Since Internal Recursion just says "can end combat as a strike during the
>> resulting combat" can Krassimir again end combat in the next round?
>>
>> Or is this an example of "During X do Y" so that Krassimir can only once
>> end
>> combat.
>
> Um.
> The former.
> Sure.
>
> And have him send me a postcard when it happens, OK?
While granting that this is not a situation likely to come up too often, it
seems like Internal Recursion should still be governed by "during X do Y"
even though it's phrased "can do Y during X". At least, that was true for
Angela Preston and Michael Luther, as seen in this earlier ruling:
Archived from groups: rec.games.trading-cards.jyhad (More info?)
Joshua Duffin wrote:
> "LSJ" <vtesrepSPAM@TRAPwhite-wolf.com> wrote in message
> news:7n3Ye.1850$QE1.218@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.net...
>
>>Name wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Caliban bleeds
>>>Krassimir blocks and plays Internal Recursion for the presence ability:
>>>"This blocking vampire can end combat as a strike during the resulting
>>>combat. If he or she does so and the acting minion is an ally or a
>>>younger
>>>vampire, this blocking vampire untaps."
>>>Caliban strikes hands
>>>Krassimir ends combat
>>>Caliban plays Telepathic Tracking at superior: "Only usable when both
>>>combatants are still ready and combat is about to end (with no uncanceled
>>>press to continue). Combat does not end; another round starts."
>>>
>>>Since Internal Recursion just says "can end combat as a strike during the
>>>resulting combat" can Krassimir again end combat in the next round?
>>>
>>>Or is this an example of "During X do Y" so that Krassimir can only once
>>>end
>>>combat.
>>
>>Um.
>>The former.
>>Sure.
> While granting that this is not a situation likely to come up too often, it
> seems like Internal Recursion should still be governed by "during X do Y"
> even though it's phrased "can do Y during X". At least, that was true for
> Angela Preston and Michael Luther, as seen in this earlier ruling:
>
> groups.google.com/group/rec.games.trading-cards.jyhad/msg/828a92eba9618e94
Excellent, thanks.
REVERSAL of Internal Recursion ruling above -- it can only be done once
in the resulting combat.
--
LSJ (vtesrepSPAM@TRAPwhite-wolf.com) V:TES Net.Rep (remove spam trap to reply)
Links to V:TES news, rules, cards, utilities, and tournament calendar:
http://www.white-wolf.com/vtes/
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.