Archived from groups: rec.games.trading-cards.magic.misc (
More info?)
"David Chapman" <jedit_ojanen8@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:2kv4juF6oe70U1@uni-berlin.de...
> From the Collected Witterings of Jonathan Lonsdale, volume 23:
> > "Andy Jakcsy" <djaxmann@aol.computer> wrote in message
> > news:20040706000425.04762.00000987@mb-m10.aol.com...
> >> Jonathan Lonsdale sez:
> >>> Nice use of selective quoting. Nice how you imply that I'm soliciting
> >>> offers by email when this was never the case.
> >>
> >> Huh? Now I'm confused. Where did he say you were e-mailing people?
> >
> > Let me reemphesise: soliciting 'offers by email'. i.e. I want people to
> > email me with offers. They wouldn't post a private offer in a newsgroup
> > would they?
>
> Ah - so that credit card theft spammer I heard from this morning isn't
> *really* spamming, because he wants me to e-mail him my credit card
details
> in private rather than give them out to everyone he spammed. My God, how
> could I have been confused for so long!
>
> >> He's just
> >> reminding you not to post those ebay sales here, lest you lose your
> >> account. You can E-mail people all you want about it, and they will
read
> >> (or delete) them at their leisure, and the snarky will block you or
> >> report you. But if you post it here, you'll definitely be reported...
> >
> > May I remind you not to drink drive or engage in other such anti-social
> > behaviour? I hope you don't find the request insulting but I would
>
> IME the only people who are offended by requests to behave responsibly are
> the people who want to behave irresponsibly and are not being permitted to
> do so. People who behave responsibly generally don't find these requests
> offensive, perhaps because they already complying with said requests and
as
> such are not affected by them, and perhaps because as a general rule it's
> the responsible people who comply to these requests that are being
> endangered and/or made unhappy through no fault of their own by the
> irresponsible people who don't.
>
> > I've been using usenet for many years by most peoples standards (13
years)
> > and I work for an ISP.
>
> Wow - 13 years of Usenet experience, and you still haven't learned to lurk
> for a while and read the charter/FAQ before posting to a new group.
That's
> an impressive lack of Clue you've got there.
>
> > I find the insinuation that I'd post an
> > advertisement in a discussion group very insulting.
>
> Then don't say "I've got cards to auction" in a group where replying "I'll
> buy them" earns you an ISP report.
David,
FYI I did read both the faq and selected archives prior to posting. There
has been little need to lurk since dejanews launched in 1995.
Despite your quoting me out of context, twisted paraphrasing, baseless
insinuations and continual reference to the charter the original post was
on-topic. Deal with it.
This thread is now so far removed from the original post with your tedious
point-scoring it is untrue. If you're no troll then you do a very good
impression of one. Congratulations.
--
Remove numbers from email address to reply.