All are in my price range, but I want to go for the card that gives the best performance dollar-for-dollar and is the most cost effective over the long-haul. I'm building my own pc to use pretty much exclusively as a gaming machine, and want to get a decent card that will give great performance for at least a couple years before needing to be upgraded.
Here are the prices I'm working with:
9600 Pro for ~ £140 ($212)
9700 for ~ £180 ($273)
9700 Pro for ~ £210 ($318)
I realize the 9700 Pro is the top performer here, but does it really perform that much better to justify the difference in prices? Based on benchmarks I've seen, it doesn't seem as if the 9700 Pro is that much better than the 9700.
With regards to the 9600 Pro, should I just go with that, and expect to have to replace it maybe a year or so ealier than I would the 9700, which would make it more cost effective. Or do you think the 9700 would hold-up so much longer than the 9600 Pro that this wouldn't be the case?
Thanks,
Here are the prices I'm working with:
9600 Pro for ~ £140 ($212)
9700 for ~ £180 ($273)
9700 Pro for ~ £210 ($318)
I realize the 9700 Pro is the top performer here, but does it really perform that much better to justify the difference in prices? Based on benchmarks I've seen, it doesn't seem as if the 9700 Pro is that much better than the 9700.
With regards to the 9600 Pro, should I just go with that, and expect to have to replace it maybe a year or so ealier than I would the 9700, which would make it more cost effective. Or do you think the 9700 would hold-up so much longer than the 9600 Pro that this wouldn't be the case?
Thanks,