Archived from groups: rec.games.trading-cards.magic.rules (
More info?)
dbd@gatekeeper.vic.com (David DeLaney) wrote in message news:<slrncm4kap.fkj.dbd@gatekeeper.vic.com>...
> On Mon, 4 Oct 2004 16:42:36 -0400, Arkady Zilberberg <arkadyz1@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Well, it's also got Extra Line Breaks at what seem to be random points between
> abilities.
This is a *bad thing* in my (computer-programming) opinion. The
spoiler lists have traditionally been relatively randomly line-broken,
but they finally(?) cleaned up the oracle, so each card-rule line is a
separate text line in the oracle. That's good. If Gather undoes
this, that's annoying.
> And it will take some time to pull up the _full_ Oracle if you
> want to do that - don't despair, it'll eventually show it all.
This could be a problem too. Although I suppose once I get it, I've
got it.
> But they did
> manage to put Knight of Dawn back in (it was missing for a while a week and a
> half ago...), so that's good. [Random-guy came into the store and asked about
> it because he wanted to buy it; we had one in the Tempest book, but I had first
> gone to try to see what set it was in, and presto, it wasn't findable in
> Gatherer at -all-...]
Not that this couldn't happen with the oracle-documents, but that's a
little worrisome too.
One other thing I like about the Oracle pages is that they are
*released*. That is, I can download the 10-1-2004 pages and compare
to the 6-1-2004 pages. I can see what's changed, and when it came
into effect. I can look back through the old pages I have to see when
something changed.
With Gather as the only source, this historical demarcation is lost.
Not a big deal, but I wouldn't want to be staring at my printed Oracle
sheets and arguing a point, only to discover that at some point, they
made a slight update to the Oracle and I didn't know it.
Finally, Gather doesn't have rules. We need the rule updates as well.
I'm particularly interested to see how they hand the Shrine
endorsement type.
On the good side, I like that you can look up all different scans
(including the ones with multiple images per set) for a card. That's
nice. And I have used it several times myself, to look up things.
So, I like it as a tool, but I also like the historical value of
'versions' of the Oracle and rules.
My 2c, so far.
Peter