Another Fork question

G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: rec.games.trading-cards.magic.rules (More info?)

Specifically this time I'm wondering if I can do this:

I tap 2 mountains to cast Fork

I sac 2 mountains to cast Fireblast

I Fork the Fireblast, thus dealing 8 damage to my opponent.

Can I do this given it's all at instant speed so both spells are still on
the stack?

Is there an in-depth description of "the stack" and how it works online so I
can try and understand the finer points of it? This might answer a lot of
my questions before I need to ask.

Thanks
Liam.
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: rec.games.trading-cards.magic.rules (More info?)

On Fri, 24 Jun 2005 23:10:29 GMT, MonoJoker <monojoker@bigjobbies.com.au> wrote:
>Specifically this time I'm wondering if I can do this:
>
>I tap 2 mountains to cast Fork

Er, no.

You tap two mountains to get RR into your mana pool. You pay RR to cast Fork.

You may be tapping the mountains DURING the announcement of Fork (since there
is a special allowance letting mana abilities be played then)... but you are
NOT "tapping the mountains to cast Fork".

>I sac 2 mountains to cast Fireblast

(In contrast, with the alternate cost, you ARE saccing two mountains (as the
cost) to cast Fireblast.)

These can be the same two mountains, by the way, that you tapped to get the
RR from.

>I Fork the Fireblast, thus dealing 8 damage to my opponent.

4 and 4.

>Can I do this given it's all at instant speed so both spells are still on
>the stack?

Er, sure, except "speed" is a word you NEVER want to use again to describe
anything at ALL in Magic, please.

You may get the RR from the Mountains, and leave it floating in your mana
pool. You may then announce the Fireblast, using its alternate cost,
sacrificing two mountains, and targetting your opponent. Leaving the RR still
floating. You may then (since you get priority again after putting a spell
on the stack) announce Fork, using the RR in your mana pool to pay for it,
and targetting the Fireblast.

Assuming no responses from either player, Fork resolves and makes a copy
of Fireblast. You choose to not change the target, so it's an exact copy
and targets opponent. The copy appears fully formed on the stack; you do
NOT play or announce it, and you do not and CANNOT pay any cost for it. It
just appears, pop! You don't, and can't, "sacrifice two more mountains".

So now you have the Fireblast, and the copy of Fireblast, both on the stack,
both targetting your opponent. That's what you wanted to do.

>Is there an in-depth description of "the stack" and how it works online so I
>can try and understand the finer points of it? This might answer a lot of
>my questions before I need to ask.

Well, there's a FAQ posted here every week or so, and there's the basic and
Comprehensive rulebooks available through the WotC Magic webpage... but
basics:

Any time a spell is played, an activated ability is played, or a triggered
ability triggers, it will end up on top of the stack. For the first two,
the player that played it gets priority again, and can add another thing to
the stack's top, take another legal action, or pass.

Any time both players pass in succession, the top thing on the stack resolves.
If the stack is empty at this time? Then the current step or phase ends, and
the next begins.

After anything resolves off the stack, active player gets priority.

Active player gets priority at the beginning of any step or phase in which
players get priority. (Things that triggered 'at the beginning of <step /
phase> will already have triggered and gone onto the stack; combat damage
goes onto the stack as combat-damage step starts, also.)

After a player passes, if both players have NOT just passed in succession,
their opponent gets priority.

The only things that use the stack are:

spells
combat damage
nonmana activated abilities
nonmana triggered abilities

If it's anything else? It does NOT use the stack, and CANNOT be responded to.

Basically, things go onto the top of the stack, and resolve, one at a time,
off the top of the stack. While something's on the stack, responses can be
made; any responses must resolve, be countered, or be otherwise removed before
what they respond to can resolve.

Dave
--
\/David DeLaney posting from dbd@vic.com "It's not the pot that grows the flower
It's not the clock that slows the hour The definition's plain for anyone to see
Love is all it takes to make a family" - R&P. VISUALIZE HAPPYNET VRbeable<BLINK>
http://www.vic.com/~dbd/ - net.legends FAQ & Magic / I WUV you in all CAPS! --K.
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: rec.games.trading-cards.magic.rules (More info?)

"MonoJoker" <monojoker@bigjobbies.com.au> wrote in message
news:Fp0ve.2870$oJ.1003@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
> Specifically this time I'm wondering if I can do this:
>
> I tap 2 mountains to cast Fork
>
> I sac 2 mountains to cast Fireblast
>
> I Fork the Fireblast, thus dealing 8 damage to my opponent.
>
> Can I do this given it's all at instant speed so both spells are still on
> the stack?
>
> Is there an in-depth description of "the stack" and how it works online so
> I
> can try and understand the finer points of it? This might answer a lot of
> my questions before I need to ask.

Sure. Just tap the Mountains, sacrifice them to your Fireblast, then use the
mana that's still floating around to play Fork, targetting the Fireblast.
Mana 'dissipates' at the end of each phase, so as long as you play the Fork
before the end of phase, you're ok.

Erich
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: rec.games.trading-cards.magic.rules (More info?)

One of the voices in my head - or was it David DeLaney? - just said...
>
> >Can I do this given it's all at instant speed so both spells are still on
> >the stack?
>
> Er, sure, except "speed" is a word you NEVER want to use again to describe
> anything at ALL in Magic, please.

Um, Dave... how exactly did he manage to cast Fork at a time when it had
no legal target?
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: rec.games.trading-cards.magic.rules (More info?)

One of the voices in my head - or was it MonoJoker? - just said...
> Specifically this time I'm wondering if I can do this:
>
> I tap 2 mountains to cast Fork
>
> I sac 2 mountains to cast Fireblast
>
> I Fork the Fireblast, thus dealing 8 damage to my opponent.

If the above order is the order you played the spells in, this doesn't
work (cannot, in fact, even be attempted) because when you announce it,
the Fork has no legal target. You would need to announce the Fireblast
first. Of course, what you can to is tap the two mountains for mana,
leave the mana sitting in your pool for a moment, play Fireblast
(sacrificing the same two mountains, if you wish), then play the Fork
before the Fireblast resolves. This will give you the end result you
want.

> Can I do this given it's all at instant speed so both spells are still on
> the stack?

With the above tweak, yes. (And don't think in terms of "speed" - there
are legal times to play different types of spells, but "speed" doesn't
really enter into it).

> Is there an in-depth description of "the stack" and how it works online so I
> can try and understand the finer points of it? This might answer a lot of
> my questions before I need to ask.

Basically, the stack is where spells and most abilities go after you
play them but before they resolve, where they can be responded to in
various ways, including the sort of thing you want to do here.

* Spells other than instants (or things that say you can play them
whenever you could play an instant), along with abilities that say you
can play them "Only any time you could play a sorcery" - for the record,
a wording I absolutely despise - can only be played when the stack is
empty (and only during the main phases of your own turn).
* Instants and most activated abilities, on the other hand, can be
played pretty much any time, including in response to other spells, and
much of the game's strategy revolves around exploiting this fact.
* When there are two or more things on the stack, they will resolve in
last-in first-out order. For example, in the above scenario, because you
had to play the Fork second (otherwise the Fireblast isn't there to
copy), the Fork copy will actuall resolve first.

Those are the basics. Like everything else, you can find the full
details in the Comprehensive Rules, available at
http://www.wizards.com/default.asp?x=magic/rules/tourneyplayer for free
download in four different formats. The thing reads like a legal
document and has, in a couple of places, a level of detail you will
hopefully never need in your entire life, but it's the definitive source
for everything but individual card wordings, pretty much.
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: rec.games.trading-cards.magic.rules (More info?)

Jeff Heikkinen <no.way@jose.org> wrote:
>One of the voices in my head - or was it David DeLaney? - just said...
>> >Can I do this given it's all at instant speed so both spells are still on
>> >the stack?
>>
>> Er, sure, except "speed" is a word you NEVER want to use again to describe
>> anything at ALL in Magic, please.
>
>Um, Dave... how exactly did he manage to cast Fork at a time when it had
>no legal target?

Well, given that he was confused about other stuff in the process, I was taking
it as "how do I arrange this to do what I want" rather than "does my exact
description apply when I'm doing this AND does it give the result I want". I
answered the former, not the latter so much... He CAN do all this, though not
in the order he had it written down.

Dave
--
\/David DeLaney posting from dbd@vic.com "It's not the pot that grows the flower
It's not the clock that slows the hour The definition's plain for anyone to see
Love is all it takes to make a family" - R&P. VISUALIZE HAPPYNET VRbeable<BLINK>
http://www.vic.com/~dbd/ - net.legends FAQ & Magic / I WUV you in all CAPS! --K.
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: rec.games.trading-cards.magic.rules (More info?)

Erich Leibrock <eleibrock@symDELETETHECAPSpatico.ca> wrote:
>"MonoJoker" <monojoker@bigjobbies.com.au> wrote in message
>> Specifically this time I'm wondering if I can do this:
>>
>> I tap 2 mountains to cast Fork
>>
>> I sac 2 mountains to cast Fireblast
>>
>> I Fork the Fireblast, thus dealing 8 damage to my opponent.
>>
>> Can I do this given it's all at instant speed so both spells are still on
>> the stack?
>
>Sure. Just tap the Mountains, sacrifice them to your Fireblast, then use the
>mana that's still floating around to play Fork, targetting the Fireblast.
>Mana 'dissipates' at the end of each phase, so as long as you play the Fork
>before the end of phase, you're ok.

Psst. Even leaving out that he has to cast the Fireblast -first- so it's on
the stack to be a target for the Fork ... he does NOT have 'until the end of
the phase to play Fork'. The mana will last that long ... but the Fork's
target, Fireblast, will have to have left the stack before then, and again
he can't play the Fork without a target. (And no, it can't target itself.)

So he has "until Fireblast leaves the stack" to play Fork targetting it,
more precisely. (Still more precisely, he has until his last getting of
priority while Fireblast is on the stack, but since Fireblast resolving
involves both players passing, it's not as easy to pinpoint that as you
might think...)

Dave
--
\/David DeLaney posting from dbd@vic.com "It's not the pot that grows the flower
It's not the clock that slows the hour The definition's plain for anyone to see
Love is all it takes to make a family" - R&P. VISUALIZE HAPPYNET VRbeable<BLINK>
http://www.vic.com/~dbd/ - net.legends FAQ & Magic / I WUV you in all CAPS! --K.
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: rec.games.trading-cards.magic.rules (More info?)

On Sat, 24 Jun 2005, David DeLaney wrote:

> Well, there's a FAQ posted here every week or so, and there's the basic and
> Comprehensive rulebooks available through the WotC Magic webpage... but
> basics:

Wow, really? Never seen it...

<off topic>
I looked on google and indeed saw the FAQ. Any idea why it never shows
up on our news server?
</off topic>

--
David
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: rec.games.trading-cards.magic.rules (More info?)

David de Kloet <dskloet@few.vu.nl> wrote:
>On Sat, 24 Jun 2005, David DeLaney wrote:
>> Well, there's a FAQ posted here every week or so, and there's the basic and
>> Comprehensive rulebooks available through the WotC Magic webpage... but
>> basics:
>
>Wow, really? Never seen it...
>
><off topic>
>I looked on google and indeed saw the FAQ. Any idea why it never shows
>up on our news server?
></off topic>

It's a fairly long triple post. Your news server might just not accept posts
longer than a certain length, thinking they are spam or encoded binaries or
something without actually checking. This is Not That Good A Policy but it's
one some servers have in lieu of doing actual checking. (You may want to see
if it's leaving things out in news.answers, rec.answers, and the other
*.answers FAQ-posting groups too...)

Dave
--
\/David DeLaney posting from dbd@vic.com "It's not the pot that grows the flower
It's not the clock that slows the hour The definition's plain for anyone to see
Love is all it takes to make a family" - R&P. VISUALIZE HAPPYNET VRbeable<BLINK>
http://www.vic.com/~dbd/ - net.legends FAQ & Magic / I WUV you in all CAPS! --K.
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: rec.games.trading-cards.magic.rules (More info?)

"MonoJoker" <monojoker@bigjobbies.com.au> wrote in message
news:Fp0ve.2870$oJ.1003@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
> Specifically this time I'm wondering if I can do this:
>
> I tap 2 mountains to cast Fork
>
> I sac 2 mountains to cast Fireblast
>
> I Fork the Fireblast, thus dealing 8 damage to my opponent.
>
> Can I do this given it's all at instant speed so both spells are still on
> the stack?
>
> Is there an in-depth description of "the stack" and how it works online so
I
> can try and understand the finer points of it? This might answer a lot of
> my questions before I need to ask.
>
> Thanks
> Liam.

Thanks to everyone who explained this - I understand perfectly now.

Cheers
LT.
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: rec.games.trading-cards.magic.rules (More info?)

One of the voices in my head - or was it David de Kloet? - just said...
> On Sat, 24 Jun 2005, David DeLaney wrote:
>
> > Well, there's a FAQ posted here every week or so, and there's the basic and
> > Comprehensive rulebooks available through the WotC Magic webpage... but
> > basics:
>
> Wow, really? Never seen it...
>
> <off topic>
> I looked on google and indeed saw the FAQ. Any idea why it never shows
> up on our news server?
> </off topic>

On mine, the newsreader thinks it's a continuation of an old thread
(from the previous times it was posted) and thus sorts it toward the
beginning. So depending on your reader, you might very well have it,
just sorted so it ends up miles away from the other new articles.
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: rec.games.trading-cards.magic.rules (More info?)

On Sun, 26 Jun 2005, Jeff Heikkinen wrote:

> One of the voices in my head - or was it David de Kloet? - just said...
>> On Sat, 24 Jun 2005, David DeLaney wrote:
>>
>>> Well, there's a FAQ posted here every week or so, and there's the basic and
>>> Comprehensive rulebooks available through the WotC Magic webpage... but
>>> basics:
>>
>> Wow, really? Never seen it...
>>
>> <off topic>
>> I looked on google and indeed saw the FAQ. Any idea why it never shows
>> up on our news server?
>> </off topic>
>
> On mine, the newsreader thinks it's a continuation of an old thread
> (from the previous times it was posted) and thus sorts it toward the
> beginning. So depending on your reader, you might very well have it,
> just sorted so it ends up miles away from the other new articles.

My newsreader is not the problem. It doesn't show tons of messages
because old ones are removed. At the moment it only shows 15 messages
for example and the FAQ isn't one of them.

I sent a message to the helpdesk to ask whether maybe the server
blocks large messages but didn't get an answer yet...

--
David