Are ATI/Nvidia colluding to cool down graphics war

Spitfire_x86

Splendid
Jun 26, 2002
7,248
0
25,780
<A HREF="http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=10952" target="_new">http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=10952</A>


----------------
<b><A HREF="http://geocities.com/spitfire_x86" target="_new"> My Website</A></b>

<b><A HREF="http://geocities.com/spitfire_x86/myrig.html" target="_new"> My Rig</A></b>
 

sargeduck

Distinguished
Aug 27, 2002
407
0
18,780
Hmmmm, interesting, very interesting.

This could be good for us, as it alows ati/nvidia more time to perfect their cards, iron out bugs, give us better cards that aren't rushed and so on.
Also, it allows us to save up to buy better cards, rather than only buying a so-so card, cuase we know there will be another one in 3 months..
 

jmecor

Distinguished
Jul 7, 2003
2,332
0
19,780
but their spending lots of million dollars making and researching cards.

<i>
"I'll Take A Quiet Life
-Handshake to Carbon Monoxide- Th.Yo."
</i>
 

lhgpoobaa

Illustrious
Dec 31, 2007
14,462
1
40,780
hmmm curious.
will we see them both sit pretty for a while then with their respective high end units... both of which are putting out similar performance figures.

<b>Regards,
Mr no integrity coward.</b>
 

davepermen

Distinguished
Sep 7, 2002
386
0
18,780
if they are that "corrupt" to plan a cartell, they are as corrupt to both plan something in the back to finally beat out the other side AFTER they slowed both down.. :D

capitalistic egoism will win out of this

"take a look around" - limp bizkit

www.google.com
 

phial

Splendid
Oct 29, 2002
6,757
0
25,780
true!

-------

<A HREF="http://www.albinoblacksheep.com/flash/you.html" target="_new"> I highly recommend you DONT click my signature. Dont say I didnt warn you!1!! </A>
 
Well considering collusion is illegal in the anti-competitive sense I'm surprised, 'cause this would be vey risky on their part. If any actual record of this were to reach trade officials then this would really hurt both companies. Just the rumour should it get picked up by enough people, would hurt both companies' standing in the community.

<b>Sargeduck,</b> collusion is NEVER good for the consumer. Companies don't collude for altruistic reasons, they do so to increase profits. Either in the short term or the long term.

Having them release products at a slower rate doesn't mean they will focus on refining them and releasing the perfect product, they will simply release them at a slower rate and not need to spend as much on R&D, and will be able to cut back on staff due to less pressure to innovate and compete. Instead of fixing the problms and delivering a new core/board. They would simply fix the old core and offer you the GF4ti 4950, or the R8800 instead of the current DX9 offerings. Just slight revision of old stuff.
It would be like cutting back on driver releases, sure they may release more per release but waiting 2 months for a driver fix they discovere 2 weeks after the last one instead of getting it in a months time, isn't an improvement. The hard fought competition helps the consumer. The 'older' cards bring high level performance into the hands of the 'everyman' and the newer technology comes sooner so we get better visuals quicker. If it were up to ATI and nV together, instead of releasing the R420 and NV 40 (likely DX10 compatible cards and the only ones near term able to play D]|[ / HL2 a high settings) in early '04, they would likely wait for Longhorn top appear with DX10 in '05. That doesn't benifit us as consumers.

This is really the WORST thing that could happen and is, as I have always said, another reason we need a strong 3rd player in the 3D market (no chance with Creative, the P10 is basically Dead for gaming, and Matrox sadly isn't going to try re-entering the market).

I just hope this is one of those 'oopps we made a mistake' rumours the Inquirer sometimes has.


- You need a licence to buy a gun, but they'll sell anyone a stamp <i>(or internet account)</i> ! <A HREF="http://www.redgreen.com" target="_new"><font color=green>RED</font color=green> <font color=red>GREEN</font color=red></A> GA to SK :evil:
 

Spitfire_x86

Splendid
Jun 26, 2002
7,248
0
25,780
I also think it's a bad news (if true)

SiS could've been a 3rd player if they were honest. Trident failed to market their XP4 due to 0.13µ problems. There's no news from S3/VIA about Delta Chrome. Seems that it will also never see light like Triedent XP4.

----------------
<b><A HREF="http://geocities.com/spitfire_x86" target="_new"> My Website</A></b>

<b><A HREF="http://geocities.com/spitfire_x86/myrig.html" target="_new"> My Rig</A></b>