hey man i'm going to add a few things to the Guide
Value Cards (upto $150)
GeForce4 Ti4200
Pros- Fastest out of all those cards, cheap
Cons- No DX9 support, Turning AA and/or AF can decrease Performance
Side note: There are three types of Ti4200
Ti4200 64mb- cheapest, second fastest(clocked higher), better quality ram
Ti4200 128mb- slowest out of the three, said to have cheap ram to reduce cost(clocked lower)
Ti4200-8x 128mb- 8X AGP, fastest, uses good ram
Radeon 8500/8500LE/9100
Pros- Cheap, full DX8 support, good IQ
Cons- No DX9 support, not so fast, 8500/8500LE are discontinued product
Radeon 9000 Pro(u made a typo )/9200 Pro
Pros- Cheap, full DX8 support
Cons- No DX9 support, not so fast, easily mistaken that it's faster than 9100
take out these two from "cards to avoid"
Radeon 9500 (non-Pro)/Radeon 9600 (non-Pro)
Pros- DX9 support, Best AA and AF performance among value cards, 9500 non-pro can be modded into a 9700 non-pro*
Cons- Radeon 9500 (non-Pro) sometimes can be very slow due to it's 4 pixel pipeline design.
Radeon 9600 (non-Pro) is bandwidth limited and unlike the pro version, not good overclocker.
*only 50% of success, only works on 9500 nonpros with L shaped ram and Red PCB
GeForce FX5600 Ultra rev2.0
Pros- DX9 support, Speedy, Faster than Radeon 9500 Pro/9600 Pro without AA/AF
Cons- Radeon 9500 Pro/9600 Pro beats it when AA/AF enabled, Radeons have better image quality, somewhat expensive, slower than Radeon 9700 (non-Pro), hard to identify among it's slower sibling GeForce FX5600 Ultra (rev1.0), Unstable performance due to Driver "issues"
and the brand selection FAQ will be made ASAP
Proud Owner the Block Heater
120% nVidia Fanboy
PROUD OWNER OF THE GEFORCE FX 5900ULTRA <-- I wish this was me
I'd get a nVidia GeForce FX 5900Ultra... if THEY WOULD CHANGE THAT #()#@ HSF
Value Cards (upto $150)
GeForce4 Ti4200
Pros- Fastest out of all those cards, cheap
Cons- No DX9 support, Turning AA and/or AF can decrease Performance
Side note: There are three types of Ti4200
Ti4200 64mb- cheapest, second fastest(clocked higher), better quality ram
Ti4200 128mb- slowest out of the three, said to have cheap ram to reduce cost(clocked lower)
Ti4200-8x 128mb- 8X AGP, fastest, uses good ram
Radeon 8500/8500LE/9100
Pros- Cheap, full DX8 support, good IQ
Cons- No DX9 support, not so fast, 8500/8500LE are discontinued product
Radeon 9000 Pro(u made a typo )/9200 Pro
Pros- Cheap, full DX8 support
Cons- No DX9 support, not so fast, easily mistaken that it's faster than 9100
take out these two from "cards to avoid"
Radeon 9500 (non-Pro)/Radeon 9600 (non-Pro)
Pros- DX9 support, Best AA and AF performance among value cards, 9500 non-pro can be modded into a 9700 non-pro*
Cons- Radeon 9500 (non-Pro) sometimes can be very slow due to it's 4 pixel pipeline design.
Radeon 9600 (non-Pro) is bandwidth limited and unlike the pro version, not good overclocker.
*only 50% of success, only works on 9500 nonpros with L shaped ram and Red PCB
GeForce FX5600 Ultra rev2.0
Pros- DX9 support, Speedy, Faster than Radeon 9500 Pro/9600 Pro without AA/AF
Cons- Radeon 9500 Pro/9600 Pro beats it when AA/AF enabled, Radeons have better image quality, somewhat expensive, slower than Radeon 9700 (non-Pro), hard to identify among it's slower sibling GeForce FX5600 Ultra (rev1.0), Unstable performance due to Driver "issues"
and the brand selection FAQ will be made ASAP
Proud Owner the Block Heater
120% nVidia Fanboy
PROUD OWNER OF THE GEFORCE FX 5900ULTRA <-- I wish this was me
I'd get a nVidia GeForce FX 5900Ultra... if THEY WOULD CHANGE THAT #()#@ HSF