A couple of question/comments about the HL 2 benchmarks. First, why were they so stingy with time limitations, and second where are the 9800 Pro 256 MB that they keep telling us we need to shell out $450-$500 for to play "the next generation of DX9 games." Why aren't they touting off about the 256 MB card? The benchmarks must have not exactly stood out from the rest, for a card that has been specifically marketed for DX9 games. I loved that THG had an ad banner advertising the GeForce FX 5900 playing while I was reading about how my ATI 9800 Pro trounces it.