9200se vs mx440

mike88

Distinguished
Apr 13, 2003
86
0
18,630
wats better? they r both about 80 AU$ and people say avoid SE... i just want a small upgrade from a g2 mx400... this is my old computer.. so it will be able to play games at a decent speed... my new 1 has a 9600 pro.. so mx 440 or 9200se?

thx
 

Spitfire_x86

Splendid
Jun 26, 2002
7,248
0
25,780
ATI "SE" cards badly suck. Radeon 9200SE is definately slower than GeForce4 MX440 and only little faster than GeForce2 MX400.

IMO, you should get Radeon 9200 (only 9200, no SE)

----------------
<b><A HREF="http://geocities.com/spitfire_x86" target="_new">My Website</A></b>

<b><A HREF="http://geocities.com/spitfire_x86/myrig.html" target="_new">My Rig & 3DMark score</A></b>
 

Spitfire_x86

Splendid
Jun 26, 2002
7,248
0
25,780
He wants to spend AU $80, not US $80

----------------
<b><A HREF="http://geocities.com/spitfire_x86" target="_new">My Website</A></b>

<b><A HREF="http://geocities.com/spitfire_x86/myrig.html" target="_new">My Rig & 3DMark score</A></b>
 

ad_rach

Distinguished
Nov 16, 2002
845
0
18,980
Get a 9100 if you can.It is cheaper than a ti4200 and is not too far off in terms of performance.It is also better than the 9200(even the non SE version).Just another stupid marketing mess.

no matter how hard you try, you can't polish a turd. :]