Some reviews you say, huh?
<A HREF="http://www.digit-life.com/articles2/radeon/r9600-2.html" target="_new">http://www.digit-life.com/articles2/radeon/r9600-2.html</A>
<A HREF="http://www.digit-life.com/articles2/radeon/asus-ati.html" target="_new">http://www.digit-life.com/articles2/radeon/asus-ati.html</A>
<A HREF="http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/video/display/gig-9600pro_2.html" target="_new">http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/video/display/gig-9600pro_2.html</A>
<A HREF="http://www.hardocp.com/article.html?art=NTMz" target="_new">http://www.hardocp.com/article.html?art=NTMz</A>
<A HREF="http://www.digital-daily.com/video/fx5600ultra-vs-radeon9600pro/" target="_new">http://www.digital-daily.com/video/fx5600ultra-vs-radeon9600pro/</A>
<A HREF="http://www.gamepc.com/labs/view_content.asp?id=gw56ufc&page=1&cookie_test=1" target="_new">http://www.gamepc.com/labs/view_content.asp?id=gw56ufc&page=1&cookie_test=1</A>
<A HREF="http://www.overclockers.co.nz/ocnz/review.php?id=03vga00r9600progexcube0r9600pro0105" target="_new">http://www.overclockers.co.nz/ocnz/review.php?id=03vga00r9600progexcube0r9600pro0105</A>
<A HREF="http://www.anandtech.com/video/showdoc.html?i=1904" target="_new">http://www.anandtech.com/video/showdoc.html?i=1904</A>
<A HREF="http://www.hothardware.com/hh_files/S&V/radeon_9600xt.shtml" target="_new">http://www.hothardware.com/hh_files/S&V/radeon_9600xt.shtml</A>
<A HREF="http://www.firingsquad.com/hardware/ati_radeon_9600_xt/" target="_new">http://www.firingsquad.com/hardware/ati_radeon_9600_xt/</A>
<A HREF="http://www.techreport.com/reviews/2003q4/geforcefx-5700ultra/index.x?pg=1" target="_new">http://www.techreport.com/reviews/2003q4/geforcefx-5700ultra/index.x?pg=1</A>
and of course THG;
<A HREF="http://www.tomshardware.com/graphic/20031015/index.html" target="_new">http://www.tomshardware.com/graphic/20031015/index.html</A>
And there are sooo many more.
Some of them are R9600XT and FX5700U reviews, but that's because they cover all the bases.
Check the dates, some are old also. But it is an old card. Also some of the reviews only put the R9600Pro againt an FX5600Ultra, but rmemeber the FX5600Ultra is far superior to any non-ultra (with or without 256mb).
In newer games it makes a BIG difference. And yes 256mb on the FX5600 is pretty much useless. OOhh it'll be better for high AA/AF, except fot the fact that it can't run the resolutions/levels required to need the extra memory because the VPU/GPU doesn't have the power. 256mb of memory on an FX5600non-ultra (or even ultra for that matter) is useless. We just discussed that it was useless on an R9600XT, so it's DEFINITELY useless on a weak FX5600U.
R9600Pro would also be my recommendation.
- You need a licence to buy a gun, but they'll sell anyone a stamp <i>(or internet account)</i> ! - <font color=green>RED </font color=green> <font color=red> GREEN</font color=red> GA to SK
<b>-NEW PIC IN THGC ALBUM-</b>