Will a new Graphics Card help if I have a 1.4ghz?

Entropy_5

Distinguished
Oct 24, 2003
11
0
18,510
My processer is a 1.4Ghz Athlon. My current card is a GEforce 3 64 meg card. And I have 512 RAM.

I dont really know much about computers but I want games to run faster so I would like to upgrade my graphics card. I dont have enough money to get a new computer. Will a faster card help me or is my processer too slow? What card would you recommend? I've heard great things about the Radeon 9600 but they are expensive now. When do you think their prices will go down. Also, if you think I should get a Radeon 9600 which version do you suggest? Thanks!
 

Spitfire_x86

Splendid
Jun 26, 2002
7,248
0
25,780
You should get noticable performance increase if you upgrade to Radeon 9600 PRO

----------------
<b><A HREF="http://geocities.com/spitfire_x86" target="_new">My Website</A></b>

<b><A HREF="http://geocities.com/spitfire_x86/myrig.html" target="_new">My Rig & 3DMark score</A></b>
 

sargeduck

Distinguished
Aug 27, 2002
407
0
18,780
Yeah, it will definetly help. I am currently running a celeron 1.1 over clocked to 1.4. I had a geforce 4 mx 440, and I slapped a 9600Pro, and what a difference. The celeron is holding me back a lot, but I am able to run all my games in 1024x768 with a little AA and some AF. Max Payne 2 I had the details very high. Halo ran decently at low settings. Tiger Woods 2004 and Need for Speed Underground I can run at pretty high settings. Of course, some times (like a whole crap load of enemies in COD), or massive graphic scenes I get slow downs. I would recommend the 9600Pro without a doubt.

Error: Keyboard not attached. Press F1 to continue
 

Entropy_5

Distinguished
Oct 24, 2003
11
0
18,510
What is the difference between the Radeon 9600 PRO and the other Radeon 9600's? I cant remember the names of the medium and low end 9600's but what is the difference in performance?
 

lhgpoobaa

Illustrious
Dec 31, 2007
14,462
1
40,780
The pro is clocked, and priced, higher.
If you can afford one, try to get a R9600pro in the 128mb form.
Good value for money!

<b>Lead me not into temptation.
I know the way myself. :evil:
Regards,
Mr no integrity coward.</b>
 

Entropy_5

Distinguished
Oct 24, 2003
11
0
18,510
Is there a reason that 128 and 256 meg cards seem to be selling for nearly the same price? Would there be a large performance difference in the 256 over the 128?
 

Crashman

Polypheme
Former Staff
The reason they are so close in price is often that the 256MB version is using slower, cheaper RAM.

<font color=blue>Only a place as big as the internet could be home to a hero as big as Crashman!</font color=blue>
<font color=red>Only a place as big as the internet could be home to an ego as large as Crashman's!</font color=red>
 

Crashman

Polypheme
Former Staff
Oh, the performance difference: In the examle I listed above the 128MB card performs much better than the 256MB card.

<font color=blue>Only a place as big as the internet could be home to a hero as big as Crashman!</font color=blue>
<font color=red>Only a place as big as the internet could be home to an ego as large as Crashman's!</font color=red>
 

shadus

Distinguished
Apr 16, 2003
2,067
0
19,790
Generally the only card you would want 256 on at this point is the top end cards... FX5950/5900/5800 in the geforce lines or the 9800 XT/Pro in the Radeon line. Most of the slower cards that have 256 are using crap memory that runs like mud, which makes your card a bit slower... also *always* avoid anything with SE in the name. They're half assed usually.

Shadus