Those of you who helped me with deciding whether to get a 5700U or 9600XT new that I was pretty tight on budget. Anyway, now, after reading reviews and talking to the guys in the CPU forum, I have been recommended the AMD 2500+ 333FSB as opposed to the Intel 2.6Ghz 800FSB.
This allows me to spend $500AUD on a graphics card!
Alright, before, I wasn't sure, because I'm not familiar with AMD's, and how well they overclock, perform etc. But that doesn't really matter now. Because, gaming is mostly dependant on graphics cards. Business applications can even work well on PIII's, so the 2500 once overclocked will have no problems!
Now, I have 4 options for GPU's (ATi means built by ATi). ATi 128MB 9700 Pro for $469, ATi 128MB 9800 Pro 501.60, Gigacube 128MB 9800 Pro Extreme for $555 (aren't they meant to be cheap?) and HIS 128Mb 9800 Pro vivo for $499.
This is a very exciting day for me. i never dreamed that I could get a 9800 Pro. If there is a flaw in my logic, or a reason why anyone thinks that I should stick with Pentium 2.6Ghz 800FSB and the 9600XT (2.5ns), please tell me at the thread in the CPU section.
Well, I actually didn't post just to gloat. I actually have a few questions. Out of those 4, which do you recommend? I am looking for good overclocking potential (so fast mem would be good), and good warranty. Which has faster mem and better warranty, ATi or HIS? I'm guessing ATi has better quality right? What about fan noise?
I know that all of those (3 of them anyway) are very good cards. But I would like to get the best out of those. So, I would really appreciate it if you could help at all. Thanks!
EDIT: I noticed that a lot of Geforce FX cards have higher core speeds and mem speeds, whilst the same buswidth and pipelines, than the 9800 Pro, yet the Radeon still beats them many of the time. I understood when comparing the 5700U to the 9600XT, because the XT had a faster core, but this has just got me stumped. Any reasons why? The comparisons would be similar with an AMD instead of Intel right?
<P ID="edit"><FONT SIZE=-1><EM>Edited by Yangster on 01/20/04 09:49 PM.</EM></FONT></P>
This allows me to spend $500AUD on a graphics card!
Alright, before, I wasn't sure, because I'm not familiar with AMD's, and how well they overclock, perform etc. But that doesn't really matter now. Because, gaming is mostly dependant on graphics cards. Business applications can even work well on PIII's, so the 2500 once overclocked will have no problems!
Now, I have 4 options for GPU's (ATi means built by ATi). ATi 128MB 9700 Pro for $469, ATi 128MB 9800 Pro 501.60, Gigacube 128MB 9800 Pro Extreme for $555 (aren't they meant to be cheap?) and HIS 128Mb 9800 Pro vivo for $499.
This is a very exciting day for me. i never dreamed that I could get a 9800 Pro. If there is a flaw in my logic, or a reason why anyone thinks that I should stick with Pentium 2.6Ghz 800FSB and the 9600XT (2.5ns), please tell me at the thread in the CPU section.
Well, I actually didn't post just to gloat. I actually have a few questions. Out of those 4, which do you recommend? I am looking for good overclocking potential (so fast mem would be good), and good warranty. Which has faster mem and better warranty, ATi or HIS? I'm guessing ATi has better quality right? What about fan noise?
I know that all of those (3 of them anyway) are very good cards. But I would like to get the best out of those. So, I would really appreciate it if you could help at all. Thanks!
EDIT: I noticed that a lot of Geforce FX cards have higher core speeds and mem speeds, whilst the same buswidth and pipelines, than the 9800 Pro, yet the Radeon still beats them many of the time. I understood when comparing the 5700U to the 9600XT, because the XT had a faster core, but this has just got me stumped. Any reasons why? The comparisons would be similar with an AMD instead of Intel right?
<P ID="edit"><FONT SIZE=-1><EM>Edited by Yangster on 01/20/04 09:49 PM.</EM></FONT></P>