Muwahhahahaha.
/rub hands together in anticipation of the NWO (Nvidia World Order)
I may be a shameless bastard, this much is true.
Its not my fault that Quadros are the best line from top to bottom!
:lol:
You must give ATI credit for pricing that thing right though. I'd still go with the Quadro for future driver support (well as it appears, for present-day support as well).
Same cant be said for NV, I was hoping the NV30 boards would go for much less than they did considering the competition. But we did get the 5900 eventually.
Its not all about quality product or pricing either, NV has a huge reputation they sold on for quite some time... they could afford a product cycle that was lackluster (5800esque-era) because of this.
I just dont think that ATI could run in the workstation market on their workstation reputation because its not really enough and ATI apparantly agrees with me.
I love the competition, I was always the biggest 3dfx fanboy forever, since my voodoo1. And others were kyro, s3 or matrox fans and now we have two camps that I'm positive are not going anywhere.
I think that most 3dfx peeps went to NV for blistering speed and software support and the others went to ATI for features.
Alas, the choice is there so many take it.. and it keeps prices down and innovation up.
Even if a few companies get squashed in the meantime due to their own stupidity, Thanks Capitalism!
Though now, ATI is getting more speed and software support than before and NV is vastly improving upon their features.. (just checkout the latest 56.64s, MPEG1-4/WMV support, ect.)
There!
That bit of rant wasnt quite as biased so maybe I've redeemed myself.
edit- some inflammatory content.
____________________________
<b>RESIDENT FORUM WARRIOR</b>
<b><font color=purple>I just neutered the cat.
Now he's a liberal.</font color=purple></b><P ID="edit"><FONT SIZE=-1><EM>Edited by kinney on 03/23/04 12:13 PM.</EM></FONT></P>