Here it is! Serious 6800 info
Tags:
-
Graphics Cards
- Font
-
Graphics
- Product
Last response: in Graphics & Displays
Andyddr
April 14, 2004 1:04:25 AM
http://mbnet.fi/elixir/NV40/
Go check the score out before it`s taken down again. Some leaked pictures from [h]ardocp's review.
A64 3200+ CAAAC 0345SPMW,Gigabyte K8N PRo,TT Venus 12,Gexcube 9800PRO 510Core 420Mem,512megs A-Data Vitesta,Antec Plus1080AMG with 430w TruePower PSU<P ID="edit"><FONT SIZE=-1><EM>Edited by andyddr on 04/14/04 03:08 AM.</EM></FONT></P>
Go check the score out before it`s taken down again. Some leaked pictures from [h]ardocp's review.
A64 3200+ CAAAC 0345SPMW,Gigabyte K8N PRo,TT Venus 12,Gexcube 9800PRO 510Core 420Mem,512megs A-Data Vitesta,Antec Plus1080AMG with 430w TruePower PSU<P ID="edit"><FONT SIZE=-1><EM>Edited by andyddr on 04/14/04 03:08 AM.</EM></FONT></P>
More about : 6800 info
splenda20
April 14, 2004 1:07:10 AM
Andyddr
April 14, 2004 1:10:40 AM
Related resources
- Please, serious help with my power supply here. - Forum
- Is anyone here familiar with Trojan: Win32/Lecpetex.B I think it's new can't find any info on it. Is it the same as A - Forum
- Need some serious help here! - Forum
- Just ran a benchmark on my SSD, and something seems seriously wrong here. - Forum
- Dilemma Here! All Info in Body Below.. HELP! - Forum
Clob
April 14, 2004 1:11:38 AM
splenda20
April 14, 2004 1:17:02 AM
MrPanther0
April 14, 2004 1:26:33 AM
splenda20
April 14, 2004 1:28:53 AM
Not really in Far Cry
6800Ultra @1024*768 4AA 8AF = 33.6
9800XT @1024*768 2AA 8AF = 34.1
only diff is 9800 uses 2AA and 6800 uses 4AA. Not enough of a performance increase to justify an upgrade IMO. This is very disappointing, hopefully ATI will perform better.
or NFS:underground
6800Ultra @1280*1024 4AA 8AF = 50.8
9800XT @1280*1024 4AA 8AF = 46.2
<P ID="edit"><FONT SIZE=-1><EM>Edited by splenda20 on 04/13/04 09:35 PM.</EM></FONT></P>
6800Ultra @1024*768 4AA 8AF = 33.6
9800XT @1024*768 2AA 8AF = 34.1
only diff is 9800 uses 2AA and 6800 uses 4AA. Not enough of a performance increase to justify an upgrade IMO. This is very disappointing, hopefully ATI will perform better.
or NFS:underground
6800Ultra @1280*1024 4AA 8AF = 50.8
9800XT @1280*1024 4AA 8AF = 46.2
<P ID="edit"><FONT SIZE=-1><EM>Edited by splenda20 on 04/13/04 09:35 PM.</EM></FONT></P>
gobeavers
April 14, 2004 1:33:24 AM
MrPanther0
April 14, 2004 1:34:30 AM
Your right, i didnt look at all of them.
1. If ATI's current card can do that then even a revamp of the current core could very well offset the NV40's lead.
I have always wondered why they didnt apply the low k+ technique to the r360 core. Look what it did to the 9600.
2. I think the higher number of pipelines are much more of a benefit at higher resolutions.
<P ID="edit"><FONT SIZE=-1><EM>Edited by MrPanther0 on 04/13/04 09:35 PM.</EM></FONT></P>
1. If ATI's current card can do that then even a revamp of the current core could very well offset the NV40's lead.
I have always wondered why they didnt apply the low k+ technique to the r360 core. Look what it did to the 9600.
2. I think the higher number of pipelines are much more of a benefit at higher resolutions.
<P ID="edit"><FONT SIZE=-1><EM>Edited by MrPanther0 on 04/13/04 09:35 PM.</EM></FONT></P>
Vapor
April 14, 2004 1:35:54 AM
After looking at all the .gifs (the benchmarks, not the IQs), here is my rundown:
FarCry 1.1 - unimpressed. Barely better than 9800XT (same overall FPS, just an extra level of AA)
NFS: U - unimpressed. BARELY faster than 9800XT at same settings.
Flight Sim 2004 - fairly impressed. Noticably faster than 9800XT on higher settings. Not a staggering difference, however.
UT2k4 - impressed. SAME speed as 9800XT, but with 4xAA/16xAF vs. 0xAA/8xAF. 12x10.
Splinter Cell: PT - impressed. SAME speed as 9800XT, but 12x10 vs. 10x7 and 0/8 vs. 0/0.
Battlefield Vietnam - quite impressed. SLIGHTLY faster than 9800XT. 12x10 vs. 10x7 and 4/8 vs 0/8.
CoD - very impressed. performance already quoted.
Overall: disappointed--I expected a blowout over the 9800XT. It certainly is a very fast card, however.
Maxtor disgraces the six letters that make Matrox.
FarCry 1.1 - unimpressed. Barely better than 9800XT (same overall FPS, just an extra level of AA)
NFS: U - unimpressed. BARELY faster than 9800XT at same settings.
Flight Sim 2004 - fairly impressed. Noticably faster than 9800XT on higher settings. Not a staggering difference, however.
UT2k4 - impressed. SAME speed as 9800XT, but with 4xAA/16xAF vs. 0xAA/8xAF. 12x10.
Splinter Cell: PT - impressed. SAME speed as 9800XT, but 12x10 vs. 10x7 and 0/8 vs. 0/0.
Battlefield Vietnam - quite impressed. SLIGHTLY faster than 9800XT. 12x10 vs. 10x7 and 4/8 vs 0/8.
CoD - very impressed. performance already quoted.
Overall: disappointed--I expected a blowout over the 9800XT. It certainly is a very fast card, however.
Maxtor disgraces the six letters that make Matrox.
Vapor
April 14, 2004 1:47:11 AM
It's sad how the only two games I play out of those benchies are FarCry and NFS: U...where there is LITTLE performance over my 9800XT. Heck, maybe even none at 441,378. I like UT2k4, but nobody else in my dorm does, and multiplayer is the only fun way to play. I'm disappointed, frankly.
Maxtor disgraces the six letters that make Matrox.
Maxtor disgraces the six letters that make Matrox.
MrPanther0
April 14, 2004 1:52:46 AM
gobeavers
April 14, 2004 1:55:52 AM
As brought up at Anandtech, NFS:U could be a (EDIT) CPU intesive app. Being that these benchmarks aren't run at the same settings I am not trusting this stuff as running in regular benchmark conditions...
"640K oughta be enough for anybody." - Bill Gates
That'll be enough L1 cache for me too...<P ID="edit"><FONT SIZE=-1><EM>Edited by gobeavers on 04/13/04 10:20 PM.</EM></FONT></P>
"640K oughta be enough for anybody." - Bill Gates
That'll be enough L1 cache for me too...<P ID="edit"><FONT SIZE=-1><EM>Edited by gobeavers on 04/13/04 10:20 PM.</EM></FONT></P>
Vapor
April 14, 2004 1:56:41 AM
[H] would not be so negligent as to use an insufficient PSU, system specs are fairly irrelevant, since those are expected FPS for the 9800XT on a modern system (and it is VERY doubtful that they used different systems). Not using the latest drivers is something [H] does not do. 60.72 is the latest and has support for NV40.
Maxtor disgraces the six letters that make Matrox.
Maxtor disgraces the six letters that make Matrox.
gobeavers
April 14, 2004 2:00:22 AM
scottchen
April 14, 2004 2:10:39 AM
I went through all the images, the motherboard looks like an Abit IC7-G, therefore it has to have a p4 procesor. It had twinx corsair ram as well.
-AMD Athlon64 3200+@2300mhz -GAK8N -3x512 Hynix PC3200 ram@192mhz 2.5-3-3-7 -Albatron 5900PV @ 560/1000 -SB Audigy -Adaptec 1210SA Raid -2x120G Seagate SATA150 7200.7 Raid0 -Enermax 460watt psu
-AMD Athlon64 3200+@2300mhz -GAK8N -3x512 Hynix PC3200 ram@192mhz 2.5-3-3-7 -Albatron 5900PV @ 560/1000 -SB Audigy -Adaptec 1210SA Raid -2x120G Seagate SATA150 7200.7 Raid0 -Enermax 460watt psu
gobeavers
April 14, 2004 2:19:00 AM
Vapor
April 14, 2004 2:39:14 AM
scottchen
April 14, 2004 2:43:16 AM
Do you know what i'm thinking right now?
6800Ultra has about 5-50% increase in performance compare to the 9800XT, here's what's making me think twice, how the hell does it get 2x 3dmark03 scores?
-AMD Athlon64 3200+@2300mhz -GAK8N -3x512 Hynix PC3200 ram@192mhz 2.5-3-3-7 -Albatron 5900PV @ 560/1000 -SB Audigy -Adaptec 1210SA Raid -2x120G Seagate SATA150 7200.7 Raid0 -Enermax 460watt psu
6800Ultra has about 5-50% increase in performance compare to the 9800XT, here's what's making me think twice, how the hell does it get 2x 3dmark03 scores?
-AMD Athlon64 3200+@2300mhz -GAK8N -3x512 Hynix PC3200 ram@192mhz 2.5-3-3-7 -Albatron 5900PV @ 560/1000 -SB Audigy -Adaptec 1210SA Raid -2x120G Seagate SATA150 7200.7 Raid0 -Enermax 460watt psu
Vapor
April 14, 2004 2:45:31 AM
TheRod
April 14, 2004 2:49:54 AM
I was wnadering...
HardOPC don't usually mess with quality settings and are fair in their comparison. Could it be a problem with nVidia drivers? Or maybe, they take the route of how much more details can you get from this new card in comparison with the existing products?
I doubt that the drivers can't deactivate FSAA or ANISO, and I doubt HardOPC took the "at equal FPS how much more detail/res. can't we get". It's weird, I can't conclude anything without the text!
I hope we will get answer soon!
--
Would you buy a potato powered chipset?
HardOPC don't usually mess with quality settings and are fair in their comparison. Could it be a problem with nVidia drivers? Or maybe, they take the route of how much more details can you get from this new card in comparison with the existing products?
I doubt that the drivers can't deactivate FSAA or ANISO, and I doubt HardOPC took the "at equal FPS how much more detail/res. can't we get". It's weird, I can't conclude anything without the text!
I hope we will get answer soon!
--
Would you buy a potato powered chipset?
TheRod
April 14, 2004 2:52:56 AM
<font color=red>Damn it!</font color=red> Have you see seen another <A HREF="http://mbnet.fi/elixir/NV40/10817474486qLMOmeutS_1_12_l..." target="_new">HEATER</A> from nVidia! :smile:
<A HREF="http://mbnet.fi/elixir/NV40/10817474486qLMOmeutS_1_14_l..." target="_new">This heatsink can easily cool a 5GHz Prescott</A>, did nVidia asked Intel about heat dissipation issue??? :smile:
At least <A HREF="http://mbnet.fi/elixir/NV40/10817474486qLMOmeutS_2_1_l...." target="_new">these numbers</A> are quite impressive for overclockers freak! :smile:
Am I sarcastic????
--
Would you buy a potato powered chipset?<P ID="edit"><FONT SIZE=-1><EM>Edited by TheRod on 04/13/04 10:58 PM.</EM></FONT></P>
<A HREF="http://mbnet.fi/elixir/NV40/10817474486qLMOmeutS_1_14_l..." target="_new">This heatsink can easily cool a 5GHz Prescott</A>, did nVidia asked Intel about heat dissipation issue??? :smile:
At least <A HREF="http://mbnet.fi/elixir/NV40/10817474486qLMOmeutS_2_1_l...." target="_new">these numbers</A> are quite impressive for overclockers freak! :smile:
Am I sarcastic????
--
Would you buy a potato powered chipset?<P ID="edit"><FONT SIZE=-1><EM>Edited by TheRod on 04/13/04 10:58 PM.</EM></FONT></P>
sparks219
April 14, 2004 2:54:52 AM
In order to increase the AF and AA settings twice, it requires quite a bit of processing power to sustain similar frame rates. I do not doubt for one second the 6800U has twice the processing power as the 9800 XT. ALso, I'm assuming a non-mature driver is being used to connduct these tests. More performance should come with some optjmization.
Depending on the OEM cost pricing, if I can get the 6800 non-pro for under 300 Canadian, and if it could be overclocked to to the ultra levels, I am extremely interested in purchasing one to replace my G4 MX440
Sparks
Depending on the OEM cost pricing, if I can get the 6800 non-pro for under 300 Canadian, and if it could be overclocked to to the ultra levels, I am extremely interested in purchasing one to replace my G4 MX440
Sparks
scottchen
April 14, 2004 3:06:41 AM
MrPanther0
April 14, 2004 3:27:19 AM
flamethrower205
April 14, 2004 3:31:32 AM
Thanks for posting man.
To all ya'll bitching, I know it's that time of month, but realize that THIS HAPPENS EVERY TIME A NEW CARD IS RELEASED. It's not necessarily meant to blaze in current games as it is with meant to blow away everything in new games. It's like the GF2U vs GF3, GF4Ti4600 vs FX5800+, etc. Happens every time- in cases of old games, they're both super optimized for em and it comes down more to pure clock speed for that specific optimization than anything else. In that case, the older core <i>should</i> win cause it's all it's made for!!
SEX is like math. Add the bed, subtract the clothes, divide the legs, and hope you dont multiply
To all ya'll bitching, I know it's that time of month, but realize that THIS HAPPENS EVERY TIME A NEW CARD IS RELEASED. It's not necessarily meant to blaze in current games as it is with meant to blow away everything in new games. It's like the GF2U vs GF3, GF4Ti4600 vs FX5800+, etc. Happens every time- in cases of old games, they're both super optimized for em and it comes down more to pure clock speed for that specific optimization than anything else. In that case, the older core <i>should</i> win cause it's all it's made for!!
SEX is like math. Add the bed, subtract the clothes, divide the legs, and hope you dont multiply
GeneticWeapon
April 14, 2004 3:35:43 AM
If anyone can explain what Flamethrower just said I would appreciate it...
<A HREF="http://rmitz.org/AYB3.swf" target="_new">All your base are belong to us.</A>
<A HREF="http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=2216718" target="_new"><b>3DMark03</b></A>
<A HREF="http://rmitz.org/AYB3.swf" target="_new">All your base are belong to us.</A>
<A HREF="http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=2216718" target="_new"><b>3DMark03</b></A>
GeneticWeapon
April 14, 2004 3:36:28 AM
Actually....scratch that.....
<A HREF="http://rmitz.org/AYB3.swf" target="_new">All your base are belong to us.</A>
<A HREF="http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=2216718" target="_new"><b>3DMark03</b></A>
<A HREF="http://rmitz.org/AYB3.swf" target="_new">All your base are belong to us.</A>
<A HREF="http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=2216718" target="_new"><b>3DMark03</b></A>
GeneticWeapon
April 14, 2004 3:36:56 AM
Kinney sucks.
<A HREF="http://rmitz.org/AYB3.swf" target="_new">All your base are belong to us.</A>
<A HREF="http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=2216718" target="_new"><b>3DMark03</b></A>
<A HREF="http://rmitz.org/AYB3.swf" target="_new">All your base are belong to us.</A>
<A HREF="http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=2216718" target="_new"><b>3DMark03</b></A>
jclw
April 14, 2004 3:42:03 AM
coolsquirtle
April 14, 2004 3:47:08 AM
GeneticWeapon
April 14, 2004 3:55:15 AM
<A HREF="http://rmitz.org/AYB3.swf" target="_new">All your base are belong to us.</A>
<A HREF="http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=2216718" target="_new"><b>3DMark03</b></A>
flamethrower205
April 14, 2004 4:04:56 AM
coolsquirtle
April 14, 2004 5:01:02 AM
scottchen
April 14, 2004 5:33:26 AM
coolsquirtle
April 14, 2004 5:55:33 AM
scottchen
April 14, 2004 5:56:14 AM
YES!! I'M SKIPPING SCHOOL TOMORROW JUST SO I CAN GET ALL THE NEWS RIGHT ON THE MOMENT THEY UPLOAD IT TO THEIR SITE!!
-AMD Athlon64 3200+@2300mhz -GAK8N -3x512 Hynix PC3200 ram@192mhz 2.5-3-3-7 -Albatron 5900PV @ 560/1000 -SB Audigy -Adaptec 1210SA Raid -2x120G Seagate SATA150 7200.7 Raid0 -Enermax 460watt psu
-AMD Athlon64 3200+@2300mhz -GAK8N -3x512 Hynix PC3200 ram@192mhz 2.5-3-3-7 -Albatron 5900PV @ 560/1000 -SB Audigy -Adaptec 1210SA Raid -2x120G Seagate SATA150 7200.7 Raid0 -Enermax 460watt psu
coolsquirtle
April 14, 2004 5:58:40 AM
scottchen
April 14, 2004 6:01:25 AM
scottchen
April 14, 2004 6:01:47 AM
gobeavers
April 14, 2004 6:03:20 AM
scottchen
April 14, 2004 6:04:20 AM
The performance charts indicate this is the 6800Ultra. But I thought that 400/1100 was the expected speed of the non-ultra and the ultra was 400+/1200? If this is an Ultra, then what will the non-ultra be clocked at? How will it perform against the R9800XT? If this is a non-ultra, then maybe we can still hope for more performance.
ABIT IS7, P4 2.6C, 512MB Corsair TwinX PC3200LL, Radeon 9800 Pro, Santa Cruz, TruePower 430watt
ABIT IS7, P4 2.6C, 512MB Corsair TwinX PC3200LL, Radeon 9800 Pro, Santa Cruz, TruePower 430watt
gobeavers
April 14, 2004 6:06:23 AM
splenda20
April 14, 2004 6:06:59 AM
Quote:
If anyone can explain what Flamethrower just said I would appreciate it...I think what he's trying to say is that we won't see a large performance increase until new games that are designed for the card are released, and that that's generally how this tech stuff works. But I think he's wrong. Remember the HUGE performance increase in ALL games that we saw when the 9700Pro was introduced. I was hoping for another second coming like that again, but it looks like NV is going to disappoint me, hopefully the new ATI offerings will cheer me up.
scottchen
April 14, 2004 6:07:08 AM
This is Nvidia's refrence cards, it's very likely that the actual manufactures will tune the speed up, and plus their interesting cooling solutions.
-AMD Athlon64 3200+@2300mhz -GAK8N -3x512 Hynix PC3200 ram@192mhz 2.5-3-3-7 -Albatron 5900PV @ 560/1000 -SB Audigy -Adaptec 1210SA Raid -2x120G Seagate SATA150 7200.7 Raid0 -Enermax 460watt psu
-AMD Athlon64 3200+@2300mhz -GAK8N -3x512 Hynix PC3200 ram@192mhz 2.5-3-3-7 -Albatron 5900PV @ 560/1000 -SB Audigy -Adaptec 1210SA Raid -2x120G Seagate SATA150 7200.7 Raid0 -Enermax 460watt psu
gobeavers
April 14, 2004 6:08:12 AM
scottchen
April 14, 2004 6:08:17 AM
gobeavers
April 14, 2004 6:09:36 AM
scottchen
April 14, 2004 6:10:19 AM
Asus is planning to push the 6800Ultra to 450/1200 core/mem. And apparently their cooling solution is suppose to be under 30dB.
-AMD Athlon64 3200+@2300mhz -GAK8N -3x512 Hynix PC3200 ram@192mhz 2.5-3-3-7 -Albatron 5900PV @ 560/1000 -SB Audigy -Adaptec 1210SA Raid -2x120G Seagate SATA150 7200.7 Raid0 -Enermax 460watt psu
-AMD Athlon64 3200+@2300mhz -GAK8N -3x512 Hynix PC3200 ram@192mhz 2.5-3-3-7 -Albatron 5900PV @ 560/1000 -SB Audigy -Adaptec 1210SA Raid -2x120G Seagate SATA150 7200.7 Raid0 -Enermax 460watt psu
Related resources
- I have about had it! Need some serious help here! Forum
- Solvedseriously and urgently need info about msi 970A-G46 mainboard Forum
- I need some serious help here Forum
- Need serious help here Forum
- BSOD here is crash dump info Forum
- Or is there still people here thet have personal info to share? Forum
- I am in serious need of advice here. Forum
- Razer DeathAdder, why 125hz could be best, here is info. Forum
- Need serious help here my build is finished and nothing's working Forum
- Bookmarked links here no longer work??!! Rob, are they serious? Forum
- Serious help needed here... Forum
- Serious help needed here Forum
- Serious help needed here guys!!! Forum
- looking for info on 6800 and 7800 series cards Forum
- Lost CD But Still Have Key...need serious help here Forum
- More resources
Read discussions in other Graphics & Displays categories
!