New card for ~$200 that outperforms 9800pro?

When the new ATI and NVidia cards come out, will there be one for around $200 that outperforms the 9800pro (which is of course around $200 right now)?

----------------------
PIV 2.4c @ 3.12ghz
1gig PC3200 (512mbx2)
ASUS P4P800
GF3 Ti200 64mb (soon to be replaced)
WinXP Pro
3DMark2001SE: 6453
3DMark2003: 746

If the X800SE is truely a 128bit 900mhz mmemory as suggested, then I doubt it will be much of a performer since it won't even have the memory bandwidth of the FX 5800. True they are different architectures, but still. Consider the performaance jump of the 5900 Ultra over the 5800 Ultra. The 5800 Ultra is superior in every way to the 5900 Ultra as far as performance goes except that because it only has a 128bit bus width the 5900 Ultra ends up doing alot better then it despite the 5900 having slower core and slower memory simply because it has a 256bit bus.

<font color=blue>_______________________________</font color=blue>
Canada
Asus A7N8X-X, Athelon XP 2500+ Barton,
Samsung 1gb DDR400, MSI GeforceFX5900 XT.
Aquamark=<b>36077</b> 3DMark03=<b>5322</b>

Seeing as how the high end ATI part coming out is supposed to offer TWICE the performance, saying that the mid-range counterpart would not compete with the 9800pro/xt is saying that it would have less than half the performance of the new top-dog!

I've never seen a performance difference this big between the high end and mid range cards in a series. Is the 9800 XT twice as good as the 9600 XT?

Unless maybe the SE is the LOW range counter part, and the X800 (pro?) is really their mid-range card, to be followed up by their high end XT part.

Me: are you saying I can't provide?
Me: cause I know I can provide.
Me: oh and I can provide money too
Rachel: why do we need money when we can just stay in our room and have sex all day?