scottchen

Splendid
Jun 3, 2003
5,791
0
25,780
None of the 6800 series has been released yet... therefore can't comment on it yet. Stick with your 5600 for another month or so, then we'll see some benchmarks on the retail cards, then you'll have a better idea on which brand you want and which type of card you want. From the current benchmarks seen at firingsquad, that card seems better than ATI's upcoming counterpart on paper.

<A HREF="http://www.ebaumsworld.com/celebgay.html" target="_new">click here now!!</A>

<A HREF="http://www.ebaumsworld.com/epilepsyr.shtml" target="_new">DON'T CLICK HERE!!</A>
 

phial

Splendid
Oct 29, 2002
6,757
0
25,780
WE TOLD YOU SO

-------
<A HREF="http://www.albinoblacksheep.com/flash/you.html" target="_new">please dont click here! </A>
<A HREF="http://www.subhi.com/keyboard.jpg" target="_new">This is you, interweb junky</A>
 

hogfather

Distinguished
Dec 9, 2003
196
0
18,680
Then again, on paper the FX's were better on paper than the ati last gen - in reality....

XP2000, 512 ddr 2700ram, GF4 MX440, XP Pro
 

entium

Distinguished
May 23, 2004
961
0
18,980
it wasn't better on paper take alook at the fx's bandwidth, transistor counts, number of pixel and vertex shaders, and pipelines. The only way on paper it would have competed with the ati's 9800 series if it had more then 33% in each of these parts over the 9800.

This all goes back to 24 bit vs 32 bit color precision