Now this is a better look (although still using DDR2 of course) at the differences.
Well the X800XT at first was outperforming at higher res in many cases which would be expected, but then in things like Lock-on, FarCry and UT2K4 w/ AA you didn't see those expected big gains. Sure it may have become closer, but it didn't pull ahead, although it did pul even from being down. I just wonder if for UT2K4 it would've shown that way without the AA, but even that's not a given. I also wonder what higher res like 19x14 would've done once you really stress resources.
Alot of info over the next little while.
I still haven't seen everyone's posts yet, but this morning I was reading one that had the X300 up against the new Intel integrated, and it wasn't impressive. I think the FX5200/MX4000-5100 and X300 lines may be dead. PS2.0 (VS in software by host) may kill the very bottom of the barrel for ATI and nV, and others of course. The new "Intel Extreme 3" (not called that supposedly) is good enough to get rid of the laughable section. Anything in the low end with SE in it's name will likely go bye-bye.
Should be interesting over the next few days.
EDIT: <A HREF="http://www.sudhian.com/showdocs.cfm?aid=555&pid=2078" target="_new">Here's the X300 in the mix that Sudhain reviewed</A>, don't know if it's and SE or not.
- You need a licence to buy a gun, but they'll sell anyone a stamp <i>(or internet account)</i> ! - <font color=green>RED </font color=green> <font color=red> GREEN</font color=red> GA to SK
<P ID="edit"><FONT SIZE=-1><EM>Edited by TheGreatGrapeApe on 06/20/04 01:11 AM.</EM></FONT></P>