Dark][Tweaker looks at Forceware Drivers

While alot of the focus has been on the GF6800 series it's interesting to see how these drivers impact the FX5900 series. Dark][Tweaker has a look at 56.72 to 62.01;

<A HREF="http://world.altavista.com/babelfish/trurl_pagecontent?lp=de_en&url=http://www.dark-tweaker.com/forceware-roundup.htm" target="_new">Translated link</A>

Some wild jumps in there, especially in synthetic benchies. Actual game performance with UT2K4 does seem best or second best with the latest drivers, so that good to see.

Original German Article;
<A HREF="http://www.dark-tweaker.com/forceware-roundup-4.htm" target="_new">http://www.dark-tweaker.com/forceware-roundup-4.htm</A>


- You need a licence to buy a gun, but they'll sell anyone a stamp <i>(or internet account)</i> ! - <font color=green>RED </font color=green> <font color=red> GREEN</font color=red> GA to SK :evil:
 

fragglefart

Distinguished
Sep 5, 2003
132
0
18,680
The charts are a tad iffy; i mean at first glance-
<A HREF="http://www.dark-tweaker.com/software/forcew6.GIF" target="_new">UT2004</A>
That looks like an ENORMOUS performance increase... and yet the difference between the highest and lowest score is <b>less than 1FPS!</b>

Now, an overclock of 5% would pwn that driver increase.
Although, since their debut, the FX's have improved drastically. I have tried most driver sets; including the seemingly endless supply of Betas.

............................................
Render times? You'll find me down the pub...
 
lol, yeah at first glance i was "whoa?!"

<font color=blue>My <font color=red>dick</font color=red> is so big, that my <font color=red>dick</font color=red> has a <font color=red>dick</font color=red>. And my <font color=red>dicks' dick</font color=red> is bigger than yours.</font color=blue>