PCIE vs AGP isnt a small addressable issue. Its better if you goto <A HREF="http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&ie=UTF-8&q=PCI+express+vs+AGP" target="_new">google and search for PCI Express vs AGP</A>
I found <A HREF="http://www.neoseeker.com/Articles/Hardware/Features/pciexpresstech/" target="_new">1 article</A>, there are lots more. Also you can try websites of the people who actually involved in PCIE, with intel being the top dog.
<A HREF="http://www.intel.com/technology/pciexpress/devnet/" target="_new">This Intel page is the place you should look at to know about PCIE.</A> There are white paper links on the right of the page.
Dell is another major company w.r.t PCIe. <A HREF="http://www1.us.dell.com/content/topics/global.aspx/vectors/en/2004_pciexpress?c=us&l=en&s=corp" target="_new">Heres a link.</A>
ATI is the another major player. And recently (just a few hours ago) they sold their 1 millionth PCIE card. They are way ahead of Nvidia I think when it comes to PCIE. And this also might be the reason that their AGP counterparts are less in production.
As far as "about an adapter for AGP-->PCIe," I dont think there is any such thing. You might be mistaking it with AGP -> PCIE bridge that Nvidia uses. Thats basically so that they dont have to manufacture 2 diff GPUs to put on 2 Diff platforms. ATI doesnt do that and their PCIE version of R420 is the R423, ie same technology but a native PCIE solution.
<i>
<font color=blue>Futile is resistance,</font color=blue><font color=red> assimilate you we will.</font color=red>
</i>
<b>Hard work has a future payoff. Laziness pays off now.</b>