Archived from groups: alt.games.champ-man (
More info?)
Toby Briggs wrote:
> Sunhill wrote:
>
>> Eduardo Liguori wrote:
>>
>>> Em Thu, 07 Apr 2005 16:15:11 +0100, Toby Briggs
>>> <toby.briggs@gmail.com> escreveu:
>>>
>>>> Eduardo Liguori wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Em Thu, 07 Apr 2005 16:01:01 +0100, Toby Briggs
>>>>> <toby.briggs@gmail.com> escreveu:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Sunhill wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Eduardo Liguori wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Boring boring 4 times boring Chelsea!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Lol...you didn`t even watch the game you silly brazillian man...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> But you must admit, we were boring!!! ;-)
>>>>>>
>>>>> even you Tobe? what a disappointment!
>>>>> first half was not so clever, but second we were great
>>>>> and I would never accept a redman calling me boring ;-)
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The ;-) should have given a clue Edu! I thought the game was really
>>>> good - end to end stuff!
>>>>
>>>> Great to see Forssell come on, albeit a few minutes at the end!
>>>>
>>>
>>> ahhh, sorry. Yep great to see the young lad back.
>>> shame on big referee and Ballack.
>>>
>>
>> The penalty was ok. It was clearly a penalty, but he did over-act when
>> he fell. Actually, two faults in one, since the acting part did
>> deserve a yellow card. The first chelsea goal was an offside as well,
>> since the ball came off a chelsea player, so I guess it evens out.
>
>
> Since when did it come off Drogba? The ball came of Lucio and did not
> touch Drogba - so fair goal! Had it have touched Drogba, then yes it
> would have been offside!
>
It was offside in a previous move, meaning the "attack" should`ve been
stopped. BUT, it`s impossible for the refs to see ALL the action. As
long as humans are refs, "mistakes" is part of the game. Who cares
anyway? Even the Bayern players didn`t protest, so it wasn`t too clear.