- Jan 1, 2004
- 11,814
- 0
- 40,810
A few 3dmark05 faqs popping up <A HREF="http://discuss.futuremark.com/forum/showflat.pl?Cat=&Board=monext3dmark&Number=4361366&page=0&view=collapsed&sb=5&o=0&fpart=1" target="_new">HERE</A>. If low 3dmark03 scores wasn't enough of a blow to fellow GF4Ti owners, then how about 3dmark05 not even running. Minimum specs to run it are:
PS 2.0 capable card with 128MB of mem
512MB system mem
Look <A HREF="http://users.erols.com/chare/video.htm" target="_new">here</A> if you aren't sure what Pixel Shader your card supports. It's a handy chart for card info.
Basically minimum of a 128MB 9600SE or FX5200 or newer/faster just to run it, although doubt those two cards will score well.
Hmm, finally something an FX5200 can beat a GF4Ti4200 at: <b>5</b> 3d05marks as opposed to not running it at all. :lol:
ABIT IS7, P4 2.6C, 1GB Corsair XMS 4000 Pro Series, Radeon 9800 Pro, Santa Cruz, TruePower 430watt
PS 2.0 capable card with 128MB of mem
512MB system mem
Look <A HREF="http://users.erols.com/chare/video.htm" target="_new">here</A> if you aren't sure what Pixel Shader your card supports. It's a handy chart for card info.
Basically minimum of a 128MB 9600SE or FX5200 or newer/faster just to run it, although doubt those two cards will score well.
Hmm, finally something an FX5200 can beat a GF4Ti4200 at: <b>5</b> 3d05marks as opposed to not running it at all. :lol:
ABIT IS7, P4 2.6C, 1GB Corsair XMS 4000 Pro Series, Radeon 9800 Pro, Santa Cruz, TruePower 430watt
Facebook
Twitter
Instagram