christof

Distinguished
Mar 30, 2003
25
0
18,530
I have just ran my first benchmark test using 3DMark 2001.

Something strange has come up that I don't understand.
On the results screen it says :- graphics chipset GF4Ti4200, and driver name : GF4Ti4800SE. Now I do have a GF4Ti4800se card, so I don't understand the chipset result. Also it says AGP rates N/A, but it's an AGP X8 card.

Any thought son these messages?

By the way the score came out at 9891.

AMD athlon XP2400+
Gigabyte GA-7VAXP M/B
Generic 2700 512mb ram
MSI 128mb ddr 8X AGP Graphics card
Seagate 120mb 7200rpm 8mb cache H/D
CD-RW + DVD
S/B Live 5.1 audio card.
 

pauldh

Illustrious
The Ti4800se is just a renamed AGP 8X Ti4400. Not sure why it stated Ti4200 not Ti4400.

ABIT IS7, P4 2.6C, 1GB Corsair XMS 4000 Pro Series, Radeon 9800 Pro, Santa Cruz, TruePower 430watt
 

TheRod

Distinguished
Aug 2, 2002
2,031
0
19,780
It's normal, 3DMark2001 returns you the Chipset family, which is TI4200. There is a lot of TI4200 variants but they are all using the same core drivers. The same thing hapen to me, 3DMark reports a Radeon 8500 series. For the AGP speed, maybe, it's because 3DMark2001 was out before AGP 8x... But I'm not sure about this one!

By the way, your reasult are looking good, I achieve 10000 with my O/C Radeon 8500 (look in my signature). And TI4200 are comparable to Radeon 8500.

--
A7N8X / <font color=green><b>AMD Sempron 2800+</b></font color=green> <-- <i>Is this affecting my credibility???</i>
Kingston DDR333 2x256Megs
<font color=red>Radeon 8500 128Megs</font color=red> @ C:275/M:290
 

christof

Distinguished
Mar 30, 2003
25
0
18,530
just ran the test again with back dated drivers. Now using 45.32 nvidia drivers, and the score came out at 10130!

How do you figure that out?

AMD athlon XP2400+
Gigabyte GA-7VAXP M/B
Generic 2700 512mb ram
MSI 128mb ddr 8X AGP Graphics card
Seagate 120mb 7200rpm 8mb cache H/D
CD-RW + DVD
S/B Live 5.1 audio card.
 

Vapor

Distinguished
Jun 11, 2001
2,206
0
19,780
Mega optimizations...try 44.01 (not sure on the last two digits). Or stick with the latest ones if you want the best gaming experience.

Maxtor disgraces the six letters that make Matrox.
 

pauldh

Illustrious
I think there is one older driver than 4401 that scored the highest, but 4401 was what I used testing all GF4Ti's. He will definately get a boost doing 4401's



ABIT IS7, P4 2.6C, 1GB Corsair XMS 4000 Pro Series, Radeon 9800 Pro, Santa Cruz, TruePower 430watt
 

GeneticWeapon

Splendid
Jan 13, 2003
5,795
0
25,780
44.01 was nVidia's biggest cheat driver.


<A HREF="http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=2216718" target="_new"><b>3DMark03</b></A>
<A HREF="http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=127163" target="_new"><b>3DMark05</b></A>
 

mopeygoth

Distinguished
Aug 1, 2003
765
6
18,985
yes; we should do a nVidia driver cheat ranking system too :p



Abit IS7 - P4E3.0@3.45- i865PE - 1024mb dual ddr400 - Leadtek 6800 128mb@380/850 - 600W dualfan(front/rear) PowerTek Psu - maxtor 4K080H4 & 6Y120P0 - samsung sm-352b