Hello there,
Just a quick benchmarking question for you. I have a new PC (p4 3.2, radeon 9800 (128 meg) and 1 gig RAM - all running at stock specs ).
The benchmark numbers generally seem good:
3d mark 2001 (1024x768) - between 17,500 and 17,850
3d mark 2003 (1024x768) is 5950 (676 CPU)
Commanche (1024x768) around 60 fps
Aquamark 43, 785
PC Mark 2002 = cpu-7890 mem-8890 hdd-1178
Far cry (PCGH_VGA demo) 1024x768 (everything v.high): average fps = 68
The one thing that concerned me a bit were my UT2003 benchmarks. At 1024x768 with everything at maximum I get around 222 as the flyby score and 80-82 for the botmatches. I have seen fly by scores up in the 240s with my specs. Do my other figures look all right and how do my UT2003 seem?
In general Ut2003 runs extremely smoothly - but the fps does drop into the 30s when things are very busy on DM-PLUNGE - is this to be expected?
I try not to get to hung up on benchmark figures - but sometimes I can't help myself :-(
Thanks in advance guys.
Just a quick benchmarking question for you. I have a new PC (p4 3.2, radeon 9800 (128 meg) and 1 gig RAM - all running at stock specs ).
The benchmark numbers generally seem good:
3d mark 2001 (1024x768) - between 17,500 and 17,850
3d mark 2003 (1024x768) is 5950 (676 CPU)
Commanche (1024x768) around 60 fps
Aquamark 43, 785
PC Mark 2002 = cpu-7890 mem-8890 hdd-1178
Far cry (PCGH_VGA demo) 1024x768 (everything v.high): average fps = 68
The one thing that concerned me a bit were my UT2003 benchmarks. At 1024x768 with everything at maximum I get around 222 as the flyby score and 80-82 for the botmatches. I have seen fly by scores up in the 240s with my specs. Do my other figures look all right and how do my UT2003 seem?
In general Ut2003 runs extremely smoothly - but the fps does drop into the 30s when things are very busy on DM-PLUNGE - is this to be expected?
I try not to get to hung up on benchmark figures - but sometimes I can't help myself :-(
Thanks in advance guys.