Archived from groups: alt.games.champ-man (
More info?)
"Rach" <rach@thisisntmyaddress.co.uk> wrote in message
news:1114961197.10158.0@nnrp-t71-03.news.uk.clara.net...
> "Miljenko" <milcrnko.spamgohome@inet.hr> wrote in message
> news:kiq9719ea6h1ueop9lrmrmnasf9bau0vur@news.t-com.hr...
>> Jabberwocky wrote:
>>
>>> Chelsea bought the title, and i said it ages ago so it's not sour
>>> grapes.
>>
>> LOL. Interesting how you dismiss some of your statements because
>> they're old and you give others credit because they're also old.
>
> Why is it bitter though? can it not simply be true?
>
Exactly my sentiments rach, I honestly don't care that chelsea won it,
because it can be dismissed in that they bought the title, which is the
truth, it's a matter of fact. Arsenal and Man U batling for second is a lot
more interesting to me.
No where am i saying chelsea aren't talented or that they don't deserve to
win it, But give Arsene or Fergie 140 mil to spend in one summer and they'll
odds on win too, it's all part and parcel of the game though. Im not bitter,
just least accept that they only won the title because they spent 200 mil
over 2 seasons.
Whilst the heart of the chelsea squad was already there, really out of what
has been bought i think they only didn't waste their money on Cech, Carvalho
or Robben. Those 3 are world class.
The english core already existed at chelsea, and the 3 players above are the
main reasons chelsea won it. Cech is possibly the best keeper in the world,
and i've watched him pull off some saves.
Credit where it's due, Great squad, you get what you pay for.
But as Blackburn showed when Jack was bankrolling, anyone can win the Prem
if they're given the license to get the players neccesary to do so.
--
`Twas brillig, and the slithy toves
Did gyre and gimble in the wabe;
All mimsy were the borogoves,
And the mome raths outgrabe."
Admin of one of the best FM sites around:
http://www.fmunderground.net/
View my Story / Poem profile on :
http://www.writing.com/main/view_item/user_id/shadowalk