Archived from groups: alt.internet.wireless (More info?)
I just bought a new HP laptop with a built-in wireless adapter. It is
a Broadcom 54g MaxPerformance 802.11g. I didn't know when I bought it
that it was not g/b. My router, and most of my system is the b spec.
Is there anything I can do besides replacing all my b hardware?
Archived from groups: alt.internet.wireless (More info?)
On Fri, 09 Apr 2004 05:33:49 GMT, Lucas Tam <REMOVEnntp@rogers.com>
wrote:
>Dick <LeadWinger> wrote in news:s1ac709iu8e0b7mn97jrvev0vj5npkiup6@4ax.com:
>
>> Is there anything I can do besides replacing all my b hardware?
>
>G is backwards compatible with B.
The Broadcom 54g with Afterburner is significantly faster than a
normal g adapter. The spec says it is backwards compatible with the
normal g standard, but says nothing about compatibility with the b
standard.
Archived from groups: alt.internet.wireless (More info?)
Broadcom Ships New 54gT Technology that Delivers Best Real-World
Wi-FiĀ® Performance
802.11g Standards Enhancement Provides Additional Speed for Home
Wireless Networks While Remaining Compatible with All Wi-Fi CERTIFIEDT
802.11b/g Products
"Dick" <LeadWinger> wrote in message
news:c9gc701009g7dm0kg5nq433uh29rbnqqkr@4ax.com...
> On Fri, 09 Apr 2004 05:33:49 GMT, Lucas Tam <REMOVEnntp@rogers.com>
> wrote:
>
>>Dick <LeadWinger> wrote in
>>news:s1ac709iu8e0b7mn97jrvev0vj5npkiup6@4ax.com:
>>
>>> Is there anything I can do besides replacing all my b hardware?
>>
>>G is backwards compatible with B.
>
> The Broadcom 54g with Afterburner is significantly faster than a
> normal g adapter. The spec says it is backwards compatible with the
> normal g standard, but says nothing about compatibility with the b
> standard.
Archived from groups: alt.internet.wireless (More info?)
Dick <LeadWinger> wrote:
> I just bought a new HP laptop with a built-in wireless adapter. It is
> a Broadcom 54g MaxPerformance 802.11g. I didn't know when I bought it
> that it was not g/b. My router, and most of my system is the b spec.
> Is there anything I can do besides replacing all my b hardware?
You're fine. "g" hardware supports connections with "b", though only that
the lower "b" speed.
--
Fundamentalism is fundamentally wrong.
To reply to this message, replace everything to the left of "@" with
james.knott.
Archived from groups: alt.internet.wireless (More info?)
Dick <LeadWinger> wrote:
> On Fri, 09 Apr 2004 05:33:49 GMT, Lucas Tam <REMOVEnntp@rogers.com>
> wrote:
>
>>Dick <LeadWinger> wrote in
>>news:s1ac709iu8e0b7mn97jrvev0vj5npkiup6@4ax.com:
>>
>>> Is there anything I can do besides replacing all my b hardware?
>>
>>G is backwards compatible with B.
>
> The Broadcom 54g with Afterburner is significantly faster than a
> normal g adapter. The spec says it is backwards compatible with the
> normal g standard, but says nothing about compatibility with the b
> standard.
As I recall, backwards compatibility with 802.11b, is a requirement for
802.11g hardware.
--
Fundamentalism is fundamentally wrong.
To reply to this message, replace everything to the left of "@" with
james.knott.
Archived from groups: alt.internet.wireless (More info?)
On Fri, 09 Apr 2004 13:55:51 GMT, James Knott <bit_bucket@rogers.com>
wrote:
>Dick <LeadWinger> wrote:
>
>> I just bought a new HP laptop with a built-in wireless adapter. It is
>> a Broadcom 54g MaxPerformance 802.11g. I didn't know when I bought it
>> that it was not g/b. My router, and most of my system is the b spec.
>> Is there anything I can do besides replacing all my b hardware?
>
>You're fine. "g" hardware supports connections with "b", though only that
>the lower "b" speed.
Others have said the same, but the adapter is seeing two networks from
neighbors, but doesn't see mine.
Archived from groups: alt.internet.wireless (More info?)
In article <avhd70llibldc0keaplusc7ibp02q3ii79@4ax.com>, Dick <LeadWinger> wrote:
>On Fri, 09 Apr 2004 13:55:51 GMT, James Knott <bit_bucket@rogers.com>
>wrote:
>
>>Dick <LeadWinger> wrote:
>>
>>> I just bought a new HP laptop with a built-in wireless adapter. It is
>>> a Broadcom 54g MaxPerformance 802.11g. I didn't know when I bought it
>>> that it was not g/b. My router, and most of my system is the b spec.
>>> Is there anything I can do besides replacing all my b hardware?
>>
>>You're fine. "g" hardware supports connections with "b", though only that
>>the lower "b" speed.
>
>Others have said the same, but the adapter is seeing two networks from
>neighbors, but doesn't see mine.
>
>Dick
SSID turned on aa the AP? Get right next to your AP and rescan for networks
(card likely prefers the faster networks, but should see your fine). I know
this sounds silly, but the AP is turned on...
Archived from groups: alt.internet.wireless (More info?)
On Sat, 10 Apr 2004 16:37:38 GMT, rico_001@hotmail.com (Rico) wrote:
>In article <avhd70llibldc0keaplusc7ibp02q3ii79@4ax.com>, Dick <LeadWinger> wrote:
>>On Fri, 09 Apr 2004 13:55:51 GMT, James Knott <bit_bucket@rogers.com>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>Dick <LeadWinger> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I just bought a new HP laptop with a built-in wireless adapter. It is
>>>> a Broadcom 54g MaxPerformance 802.11g. I didn't know when I bought it
>>>> that it was not g/b. My router, and most of my system is the b spec.
>>>> Is there anything I can do besides replacing all my b hardware?
>>>
>>>You're fine. "g" hardware supports connections with "b", though only that
>>>the lower "b" speed.
>>
>>Others have said the same, but the adapter is seeing two networks from
>>neighbors, but doesn't see mine.
>>
>>Dick
>
>SSID turned on aa the AP? Get right next to your AP and rescan for networks
>(card likely prefers the faster networks, but should see your fine). I know
>this sounds silly, but the AP is turned on...
I solved my problem , but don't know why. I changed the security key
from 128-bit to 64-bit, and all computers now see each other. What is
puzzling is that the router and all adapters are spec'd for 128-bit
security. I had been using 128-bit all along with my "B" network.
But when I added the new laptop with the Broadcom "G" adapter, it
couldn't connect no matter what I did. It's fixed, so I'm happy, but
would rather have 128-bit.
Archived from groups: alt.internet.wireless (More info?)
In article <nkhj70ddhth8q4bnq2bnfjcesv2vnukd4i@4ax.com>, Dick <LeadWinger> wrote:
>On Sat, 10 Apr 2004 16:37:38 GMT, rico_001@hotmail.com (Rico) wrote:
>
>>In article <avhd70llibldc0keaplusc7ibp02q3ii79@4ax.com>, Dick <LeadWinger>
> wrote:
>>>On Fri, 09 Apr 2004 13:55:51 GMT, James Knott <bit_bucket@rogers.com>
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>>Dick <LeadWinger> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I just bought a new HP laptop with a built-in wireless adapter. It is
>>>>> a Broadcom 54g MaxPerformance 802.11g. I didn't know when I bought it
>>>>> that it was not g/b. My router, and most of my system is the b spec.
>>>>> Is there anything I can do besides replacing all my b hardware?
>>>>
>>>>You're fine. "g" hardware supports connections with "b", though only that
>>>>the lower "b" speed.
>>>
>>>Others have said the same, but the adapter is seeing two networks from
>>>neighbors, but doesn't see mine.
>>>
>>>Dick
>>
>>SSID turned on aa the AP? Get right next to your AP and rescan for networks
>>(card likely prefers the faster networks, but should see your fine). I know
>>this sounds silly, but the AP is turned on...
>
>I solved my problem , but don't know why. I changed the security key
>from 128-bit to 64-bit, and all computers now see each other. What is
>puzzling is that the router and all adapters are spec'd for 128-bit
>security. I had been using 128-bit all along with my "B" network.
>But when I added the new laptop with the Broadcom "G" adapter, it
>couldn't connect no matter what I did. It's fixed, so I'm happy, but
>would rather have 128-bit.
>
>Dick
Sounds like a vendor issue. I'd see if Broadcom has a new driver available.
Note also whenever you encounter a similar issue turn off all encryption
and such until things are seeing each other and working, then start
encryption and security. Until the thing works, there is nothing to
secure...
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.