Some interesting results and a conclusion that matches what I'd been saying for a while (no more optimizations to make the FXs match the radeons).
<A HREF="http://www.digital-daily.com/video/3dmark-2005pro/index04.htm" target="_new">http://www.digital-daily.com/video/3dmark-2005pro/index04.htm</A>
Interesting on the surface, especially since it includes the individual tests. Interesting to see the GMA900/IntelExtreme3 with the high fill rate it has (it has pixel shaders just no vertex shaders).
- You need a licence to buy a gun, but they'll sell anyone a stamp <i>(or internet account)</i> ! - <font color=green>RED </font color=green> <font color=red> GREEN</font color=red> GA to SK
<A HREF="http://www.digital-daily.com/video/3dmark-2005pro/index04.htm" target="_new">http://www.digital-daily.com/video/3dmark-2005pro/index04.htm</A>
Interesting on the surface, especially since it includes the individual tests. Interesting to see the GMA900/IntelExtreme3 with the high fill rate it has (it has pixel shaders just no vertex shaders).
- You need a licence to buy a gun, but they'll sell anyone a stamp <i>(or internet account)</i> ! - <font color=green>RED </font color=green> <font color=red> GREEN</font color=red> GA to SK