Aha, an article involving Thomas!
I naturally assumed Lars, since it wasn't on the page, I didn't bother to check (lazy).
Finally, check the Anandtech preview,
What makes you think I didn't? I wouldn't know if there were something extrordinary to warrant me finally linking them if I didn't at least read it.
And yes they gave props to ATi after the results.
Reluctantly, qualified, and with a bunch of extraneous information not pertinent to Crossfire itself. I don't remember Anand mentioning the NF4's issues when they reviewed SLi, why bother mentioning it in the Crossfire review when the southbridge's are not really influential here (how does revision A's USB woes effect performance of Crossfire)? The only reason to do so is to try and bring some FUD to the fore to help out nV. Mention it once, and then move on, instead they keep harping on an issue that may not matter to anyone. Who cares if it's an ATi or ULi southbridge anyways as long as it works? And how does that greatly impact your performance if your mouse keyboard and printer are functioning at 360Mb/s instead of 480?
Why nothing like this about the NF4 growing pains in the SLi previews/reviews? No those were much more effusive ignoring/dismissing any potential issues with statements like;
<i><font color=green>"In our conversation with NVIDIA, we noted that this technology should work with all software without any modification necessary, "</i></font color=green>
or
<font color=green><i>"Despite the early nature of the motherboard, it was 100% stable and didn't crash once during our hours of testing nor in the 12 hours of burn-in before that. There were some rendering issues during some of the testing but we'd chalk that up to drivers that need some work; one thing to keep in mind is that SLI is extremely driver intensive and we'll explain why in a moment. "</i></font color=green>
or
<font color=green><i>"Surprisingly enough, throughout all of our testing, we didn’t encounter any rendering issues in SLI mode. NVIDIA insists that they have tested quite a few of the top 100 games to ensure that there aren’t any issues with SLI mode and it does seem that they’ve done a good job with their driver. If the driver hasn’t been profiled with a game, it will default to single-GPU mode to avoid any rendering issues, but the user can always force SLI mode if they wish"</i></font color=green>
or
<font color=green><i>"While companies like ASUS, Gigabyte and MSI are working to get their boards out before the end of the year, it looks like the majority of manufacturers won’t have product on the streets until the first few months of 2005. We’d anticipate that by the middle of 2005, you’ll be able to purchase SLI motherboards for near mainstream Socket-939 prices,"</i></font color=green>
(Anyone seen an SLi board for near the same price of a 'mainstream' S939 board? Maybe abother month it's not quite the middle of '05 yet right?
)
etc, etc, etc..
All of this plus the constant repetition of myth of the 'upgrade potential' and falling prices and how this would be a great option that offered '40-70%' performance boost where it counts.
Compare that overexcited praise of SLi (with no reservation that the rest of the community and reviewers had) with the costant 'it's nice but they still have alot of work to fix other issues' tone of their Crossfire review and see if I'm wrong about the tone of their review compred to just about everyone else's. They go out of their way to find some tarnish on any silver linning ATi might have.
Crossfire is still a niche product, but when reading Anand's review it's obvious where they stand in the grand PR/Marketing scheme of things.
I will always read their reviews, but more for the entertainment value of 'what will they think of next?' than for any indepth examination.
- You need a licence to buy a gun, but they'll sell anyone a stamp <i>(or internet account)</i> ! - <A HREF="http://www.redgreen.com/" target="_new"><font color=green>RED </font color=green> <font color=red> GREEN</font color=red></A> GA to SK