R520 512bit PCIe/AGP

mozzartusm

Splendid
Sep 17, 2004
4,693
0
22,780
Quoted from ShadowMage
R520 will be the newest generation high <something> GPU. There will be 3 types: XT, XL and LE. They will run at 600/700, 500/500, and 450/250, respectively. No info on pipelines, we only know that the memory bus will be 512bit.
RoadMap here <A HREF="http://www.hkepc.com/bbs/viewthread.php?tid=451065" target="_new">http://www.hkepc.com/bbs/viewthread.php?tid=451065</A>

__________________


ASUS P5WD2 Premium
Intel 3.73 EE @ 5.6Ghz
XMS2 DDR2 @ 1180Mhz

<A HREF="http://valid.x86-secret.com/records.php?PHPSESSID=792e8f49d5d9b8a4d1ad6f40ca029756" target="_new">#2 CPUZ</A>
SuperPI 25secs
 

Action_Man

Splendid
Jan 7, 2004
3,857
0
22,780
Wavey Dave at beyond3d has said no to a 512bit bus. I don't think we'll see it either, it'd be too expensive.

Some people are like slinkies....
Not really good for anything but you cant help smile when you see one tumble down the stairs.
 

pauldh

Illustrious
As nice as that sounds, I think you are right. Too expensive. Could explain how a R520XL clocked 500/500 could beat the 7800GTX :eek: (*Paul hopes*)



<A HREF="http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=658042" target="_new">3DMark05</A> <A HREF="http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=3781954" target="_new">3DMark03</A>
 
I hate to say I agree, <i>as it would be what the next gen cards ARE missing and what I've advocated over simply getting more exotic memory all the time</i>, but I do agree that the price is somewhat of an issue.

The only current cards with 512mb memory bus (outside of the core) is the Realizm series, and they are far from cheap. How much it would cost to support it on the chip (tansistor wise) and the board (layer wise) is the real question. You could have rediculous bandw1dth with 400 MHZ plain 2.5nsDDR (like that used on some FX5200U).

Eventually they may have to go that route unless they can get XDR for cheap. Imagine if the G70 WAS a 32 pipe card, what kind of memory restrictions that would have, heck even now I'd say it's b@ndwidth limited.

Everyone says it's expensive and I would've bought that when people were poo-pooing $399 cards, but now paying $700 for single cards and $1000+ for two is actually a reality, so what is 'too expensive'? And is it really THAT much more expensive than trying to squeeze ever more power out of the memory limited cores. Either they need to move to geater bitwidth, cheaper-faster memory, or better memory compression. We'll see how long before they need all three.


- You need a licence to buy a gun, but they'll sell anyone a stamp <i>(or internët account)</i> ! - <A HREF="http://www.redgreen.com/" target="_new"><font color=green>RED </font color=green> <font color=red> GREEN</font color=red></A> GA to SK :evil:
 

mozzartusm

Splendid
Sep 17, 2004
4,693
0
22,780
Pictures of the core <A HREF="http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/showthread.php?t=72085" target="_new">http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/showthread.php?t=72085</A>

If you scroll down to the bottom you will see a pic of the R520 up next to the G70

ASUS P5WD2 Premium
Intel 3.73 EE @ 5.6Ghz
XMS2 DDR2 @ 1180Mhz

<A HREF="http://valid.x86-secret.com/records.php?PHPSESSID=792e8f49d5d9b8a4d1ad6f40ca029756" target="_new">#2 CPUZ</A>
SuperPI 25secs
 

mozzartusm

Splendid
Sep 17, 2004
4,693
0
22,780
Page 2 they are saying that it looks to be 32 pipes

ASUS P5WD2 Premium
Intel 3.73 EE @ 5.6Ghz
XMS2 DDR2 @ 1180Mhz

<A HREF="http://valid.x86-secret.com/records.php?PHPSESSID=792e8f49d5d9b8a4d1ad6f40ca029756" target="_new">#2 CPUZ</A>
SuperPI 25secs
 

mozzartusm

Splendid
Sep 17, 2004
4,693
0
22,780
BUMP

ASUS P5WD2 Premium
Intel 3.73 EE @ 5.6Ghz
XMS2 DDR2 @ 1180Mhz

<A HREF="http://valid.x86-secret.com/records.php?PHPSESSID=792e8f49d5d9b8a4d1ad6f40ca029756" target="_new">#2 CPUZ</A>
SuperPI 25secs
 

mozzartusm

Splendid
Sep 17, 2004
4,693
0
22,780
BUMP

ASUS P5WD2 Premium
Intel 3.73 EE @ 5.6Ghz
XMS2 DDR2 @ 1180Mhz

<A HREF="http://valid.x86-secret.com/records.php?PHPSESSID=792e8f49d5d9b8a4d1ad6f40ca029756" target="_new">#2 CPUZ</A>
SuperPI 25secs
 

mozzartusm

Splendid
Sep 17, 2004
4,693
0
22,780
BUMP

ASUS P5WD2 Premium
Intel 3.73 EE @ 5.6Ghz
XMS2 DDR2 @ 1180Mhz

<A HREF="http://valid.x86-secret.com/records.php?PHPSESSID=792e8f49d5d9b8a4d1ad6f40ca029756" target="_new">#2 CPUZ</A>
SuperPI 25secs
 

mozzartusm

Splendid
Sep 17, 2004
4,693
0
22,780
BUMP

ASUS P5WD2 Premium
Intel 3.73 EE @ 5.6Ghz
XMS2 DDR2 @ 1180Mhz

<A HREF="http://valid.x86-secret.com/records.php?PHPSESSID=792e8f49d5d9b8a4d1ad6f40ca029756" target="_new">#2 CPUZ</A>
SuperPI 25secs
 

mozzartusm

Splendid
Sep 17, 2004
4,693
0
22,780
BUMP

ASUS P5WD2 Premium
Intel 3.73 EE @ 5.6Ghz
XMS2 DDR2 @ 1180Mhz

<A HREF="http://valid.x86-secret.com/records.php?PHPSESSID=792e8f49d5d9b8a4d1ad6f40ca029756" target="_new">#2 CPUZ</A>
SuperPI 25secs
 

mozzartusm

Splendid
Sep 17, 2004
4,693
0
22,780
BUMP

ASUS P5WD2 Premium
Intel 3.73 EE @ 5.6Ghz
XMS2 DDR2 @ 1180Mhz

<A HREF="http://valid.x86-secret.com/records.php?PHPSESSID=792e8f49d5d9b8a4d1ad6f40ca029756" target="_new">#2 CPUZ</A>
SuperPI 25secs
 

mozzartusm

Splendid
Sep 17, 2004
4,693
0
22,780
BUMP

ASUS P5WD2 Premium
Intel 3.73 EE @ 5.6Ghz
XMS2 DDR2 @ 1180Mhz

<A HREF="http://valid.x86-secret.com/records.php?PHPSESSID=792e8f49d5d9b8a4d1ad6f40ca029756" target="_new">#2 CPUZ</A>
SuperPI 25secs
 

mozzartusm

Splendid
Sep 17, 2004
4,693
0
22,780
BUMP

ASUS P5WD2 Premium
Intel 3.73 EE @ 5.6Ghz
XMS2 DDR2 @ 1180Mhz

<A HREF="http://valid.x86-secret.com/records.php?PHPSESSID=792e8f49d5d9b8a4d1ad6f40ca029756" target="_new">#2 CPUZ</A>
SuperPI 25secs
 

mozzartusm

Splendid
Sep 17, 2004
4,693
0
22,780
BUMP

ASUS P5WD2 Premium
Intel 3.73 EE @ 5.6Ghz
XMS2 DDR2 @ 1180Mhz

<A HREF="http://valid.x86-secret.com/records.php?PHPSESSID=792e8f49d5d9b8a4d1ad6f40ca029756" target="_new">#2 CPUZ</A>
SuperPI 25secs
 

mozzartusm

Splendid
Sep 17, 2004
4,693
0
22,780
BUMP

ASUS P5WD2 Premium
Intel 3.73 EE @ 5.6Ghz
XMS2 DDR2 @ 1180Mhz

<A HREF="http://valid.x86-secret.com/records.php?PHPSESSID=792e8f49d5d9b8a4d1ad6f40ca029756" target="_new">#2 CPUZ</A>
SuperPI 25secs
 

mozzartusm

Splendid
Sep 17, 2004
4,693
0
22,780
BUMP

ASUS P5WD2 Premium
Intel 3.73 EE @ 5.6Ghz
XMS2 DDR2 @ 1180Mhz

<A HREF="http://valid.x86-secret.com/records.php?PHPSESSID=792e8f49d5d9b8a4d1ad6f40ca029756" target="_new">#2 CPUZ</A>
SuperPI 25secs
 

Action_Man

Splendid
Jan 7, 2004
3,857
0
22,780
Perhaps eDRAM could be a solution. The xbox360 can do 4xMSAA at 720P with only a 5% hit on performance so if you upped the EDRAM to say 15 or 20MB you could do the higher resolutions needed for PC. Thoughts anyone?

Some people are like slinkies....
Not really good for anything but you cant help smile when you see one tumble down the stairs.
 

Action_Man

Splendid
Jan 7, 2004
3,857
0
22,780
I think its a fake or so they say at beyond3d.

Some people are like slinkies....
Not really good for anything but you cant help smile when you see one tumble down the stairs.
 

pauldh

Illustrious
Ah man, don't say that. I was just enjoying the pictures.


<A HREF="http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=658042" target="_new">3DMark05</A> <A HREF="http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=3781954" target="_new">3DMark03</A>
 
Wholey Bump Batman! :tongue:


- You need a licence to buy a gun, but they'll sell anyone a stamp <i>(or internët account)</i> ! - <A HREF="http://www.redgreen.com/" target="_new"><font color=green>RED </font color=green> <font color=red> GREEN</font color=red></A> GA to SK :evil:
 
eDRAM makes sense for the Xb0x because it does not have dedicated texture RaM, moving the necessary amount on package isn't going to work for all applications, but it would be helpful, and yes you would need at least 20MB to make it worthwhile for PCs and even then it'd limit it's use for certain resolutions and AA settings and it wouldn't be applicable to AF applications.


- You need a licence to buy a gun, but they'll sell anyone a stamp <i>(or internët account)</i> ! - <A HREF="http://www.redgreen.com/" target="_new"><font color=green>RED </font color=green> <font color=red> GREEN</font color=red></A> GA to SK :evil:
 

Action_Man

Splendid
Jan 7, 2004
3,857
0
22,780
I think 20MB would be ok. 1600x1200 is 30MB and with 4x FSAA applied its 70MB. So with 20MB you'd could do that in 2 tiles with no AA and 4 tiles with AA applied. Not too bad. It could work down the line.

Some people are like slinkies....
Not really good for anything but you cant help smile when you see one tumble down the stairs.
 

mozzartusm

Splendid
Sep 17, 2004
4,693
0
22,780
I just found an R520 card at ZipZoomFly! [/Then I woke up]

ASUS P5WD2 Premium
Intel 3.73 EE @ 5.6Ghz
XMS2 DDR2 @ 1180Mhz

<A HREF="http://valid.x86-secret.com/records.php?PHPSESSID=792e8f49d5d9b8a4d1ad6f40ca029756" target="_new">#2 CPUZ</A>
SuperPI 25secs
 
I just found an R520 card at ZipZoomFly! [/Then I woke up]

LOL!

Yeah I had a similar dream with white fluffy coulds. :wink:

You're ahead by a week or two...


"that's when the hornet stung me and I had a fever-ish Dream" - <i>Ahead by a Century</i> _ Tragically Hip



- You need a licence to buy a gun, but they'll sell anyone a stamp <i>(or internët account)</i> ! - <A HREF="http://www.redgreen.com/" target="_new"><font color=green>RED </font color=green> <font color=red> GREEN</font color=red></A> GA to SK :evil: