Creative Annihilator2 MX GeForce2 MX 32M DDR

[Guest]

does anyone know any links to benches or reviews of this card? is it nearly the same as the sdr cause of the 128bit sdr and 64bit ddr?

the ddr seems to be priced cheaper to their sdr versions

its selling for 185 retail cdn while the asus sdr mx is 199

 

[Guest]

Hi

I once sent a mail to Toms Hardware Guide abourt this but nothing realy happend???

Let's hope that Tom or who ever tests graphic cards would do us this service. Please test this card and compair it to other non DDR based GeForce2 MX cards.



Best regards

Xian

 

[Guest]

Here's the link:
<A HREF="http://www.tbreak.com/reviews/hardware/graphics/hercules3dprophmx/3dpromx_3.asp" target="_new">http://www.tbreak.com/reviews/hardware/graphics/hercules3dprophmx/3dpromx_3.asp</A>


<P ID="edit"><FONT SIZE=-1><EM>Edited by krazynammer on 11/12/00 04:41 AM.</EM></FONT></P>

 

[Guest]

64Bit Memory Blows. Akin M64, the DDR GeForce 2MX is much slower than the 128 BIT SRD Version. DDR dosen't help when the pathway is to small. Check out the tbreak review

 

[Guest]

The Creative MX DDR has a lower bandwidth (2.288 Gbytes/sec) than most other MXs (2.656 Gbytes/sec). This is due to the slower memory (7ns clocked at 143 MHz). For it to perform similarly, the memory clock would need to be at 166 MHz. Throw in some additionaly latencies associated with DDR memory and even then it might not outperform at 166 MHz.

Lifeguard1999

My other computers are:
544 CPU Cray T3E, 512 IBM SMP, 512 SGI O3K, etc.
and yours are?