Archived from groups: alt.internet.wireless (More info?)
I am confused about this.
If I enable mac filtering, how can someone spoof the mac address?
Wouldn't the spoofer have to gain access to the network to even know what
address to spoof?
Archived from groups: alt.internet.wireless (More info?)
bam Bino wrote:
> I am confused about this.
>
> If I enable mac filtering, how can someone spoof the mac address?
> Wouldn't the spoofer have to gain access to the network to even know what
> address to spoof?
No. Your mac is readable every time you use WiFi.
--
Fundamentalism is fundamentally wrong.
To reply to this message, replace everything to the left of "@" with
james.knott.
Archived from groups: alt.internet.wireless (More info?)
bam Bino wrote:
> I am confused about this.
>
> If I enable mac filtering, how can someone spoof the mac address?
> Wouldn't the spoofer have to gain access to the network to even know
> what address to spoof?
>
No... the spoofer would monitor your wireless traffic and make a note of
the MAC addresses you are using - when MAC xxxxxx goes off-air he would
spoof MAC xxxxxx and connect.... your router will 'assume' it is the
(genuine) MAC connecting again.
Archived from groups: alt.internet.wireless (More info?)
On Sat, 1 May 2004 18:56:14 -0600, in alt.internet.wireless , "bam Bino"
<ban@LKDEK.COM> wrote:
>Good stuff. Thanks.
>
>It kind of sounds like asking the other person's name at the biginning of
>every sentence.
More like prefacing your remarks with your own name. If you've ever taken
part in a phone conference call, you'd know that this is quite often
necessary.
--
Mark McIntyre
CLC FAQ <http://www.eskimo.com/~scs/C-faq/top.html>
CLC readme: <http://www.angelfire.com/ms3/bchambless0/welcome_to_clc.html>
----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! >100,000 Newsgroups
---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =---
Archived from groups: alt.internet.wireless (More info?)
On Sun, 2 May 2004 11:48:21 -0600, in alt.internet.wireless , "bam Bino"
<ban@LKDEK.COM> wrote:
>I thought when i asked my question that I knew everything about wireless
>protocols.
>
>Now you're telling me that I need to read up on them.
>Thanks for shattering my world.
I have no idea whether you're trying to be ironic, or merely clueless. Nor,
frankly do I care. Your posts seem increasingly trollish. Therefore I
propose to plonk you.
>
>I always think it's funny when some geek gives you the "of course it has to
>be this way", while simultaneously some other geek is working on a way to
>may it not so.
You voiced amazement at how 802.x works *today*, you didn't ask how some
different protocol might work in the future. If you want my predictions
for the future, send me twenty bucks, no cheques accepted.
--
Mark McIntyre
CLC FAQ <http://www.eskimo.com/~scs/C-faq/top.html>
CLC readme: <http://www.angelfire.com/ms3/bchambless0/welcome_to_clc.html>
----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! >100,000 Newsgroups
---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =---
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.