Voodoo5 6000 vs. GF2 Ultra's Results
Tags:
-
Graphics Cards
- Development
- PCI
-
Graphics
Last response: in Graphics & Displays
Anonymous
a
b
U
Graphics card
February 8, 2001 9:50:44 PM
The development of Voodoo5 6000 had gone through several observable changes.On the first demo sample (Fig. 1), collocations of 4 VSA-100 chips were found entirely different comparing to that of the original design (Fig. 2). In November 2000, 3dfx display the final version on which the Intel PCI-to-PCI bridge chip that had been on there before is replaced by a HINT PCI-to-PCI bridge chip (Fig. 1).
...
From the above results, it can be know that Voodoo5 6000 is no over +5% faster than GeForce2 Ultra, while it has been show that there will be at least a +25% performance lead of NV20 over GeForce2 Ultra in the NV20 preview. So it should be more smarter to wait for a just coming NV20 than rush out to bid that Quantum 3D Voodoo5 6000 PC (if it was there) at eBay.
http://www.geocities.com/tnaw_xtennis/NV20-4.htm
...
From the above results, it can be know that Voodoo5 6000 is no over +5% faster than GeForce2 Ultra, while it has been show that there will be at least a +25% performance lead of NV20 over GeForce2 Ultra in the NV20 preview. So it should be more smarter to wait for a just coming NV20 than rush out to bid that Quantum 3D Voodoo5 6000 PC (if it was there) at eBay.
http://www.geocities.com/tnaw_xtennis/NV20-4.htm
More about : voodoo5 6000 gf2 ultra results
scarecrow
February 8, 2001 10:13:29 PM
Dude,
where have you been? 3dfx went out of business. As far as I know the 6000 never went into production.
<A HREF="http://www.seti.tomshardware.com" target="_new">Join The Tom's Hardware SETI@Home Team</A>
where have you been? 3dfx went out of business. As far as I know the 6000 never went into production.
<A HREF="http://www.seti.tomshardware.com" target="_new">Join The Tom's Hardware SETI@Home Team</A>
Grizely1
February 8, 2001 10:58:34 PM
Related resources
- Kyro2 vs GF2 vs Voodoo5 vs Radeon - Forum
- GF2 Ti vs GF2 Ultra - Forum
- inno3d vs visiontech GF2 ULTRA - Forum
JoeHead
February 8, 2001 11:11:53 PM
Grizely1
February 9, 2001 4:45:42 PM
Grizely1
February 10, 2001 12:40:49 PM
scarecrow
February 10, 2001 4:00:58 PM
The 6000 would have been awsome exept for having to use the external power supply. It definetly would not have been for someone with a mini case. They were large cards but I don't think they were 1.5' long (if recall correctly).
<A HREF="http://www.seti.tomshardware.com" target="_new">Join The Tom's Hardware SETI@Home Team</A>
<A HREF="http://www.seti.tomshardware.com" target="_new">Join The Tom's Hardware SETI@Home Team</A>
Grizely1
February 10, 2001 4:19:02 PM
scarecrow
February 10, 2001 5:19:14 PM
Than that must have been a gag photo. They were only a couple of inches longer than a 5500 was. Trust me. I've seen plenty of them.
Unless the guy your talking about was a midget. LOL.
<A HREF="http://www.seti.tomshardware.com" target="_new">Join The Tom's Hardware SETI@Home Team</A><P ID="edit"><FONT SIZE=-1><EM>Edited by ScareCrow on 02/10/01 11:19 AM.</EM></FONT></P>
Unless the guy your talking about was a midget. LOL.
<A HREF="http://www.seti.tomshardware.com" target="_new">Join The Tom's Hardware SETI@Home Team</A><P ID="edit"><FONT SIZE=-1><EM>Edited by ScareCrow on 02/10/01 11:19 AM.</EM></FONT></P>
Grizely1
February 10, 2001 6:47:06 PM
scarecrow
February 10, 2001 7:42:42 PM
I was a sys admin there before they went under. Don't get me wrong though, the card was rather big.
<A HREF="http://www.seti.tomshardware.com" target="_new">Join The Tom's Hardware SETI@Home Team</A>
<A HREF="http://www.seti.tomshardware.com" target="_new">Join The Tom's Hardware SETI@Home Team</A>
Grizely1
February 10, 2001 7:53:11 PM
Grizely1
February 11, 2001 12:56:46 AM
Tempus
February 11, 2001 1:44:11 AM
Grizely1
February 11, 2001 4:31:30 PM
Read discussions in other Graphics & Displays categories
!