Archived from groups: rec.games.video.arcade.marketplace,rec.games.video.arcade.collecting (
More info?)
I have a GREAT idea.
Just send me 1 of each board and I'll have my team of video game testers
(me, my son, my wife and anyone who comes over) thoroughly test and review
both kits from a home user perspective. i'll post my results here and
endorse the overall best product.
of course for my time and endorsement, i'd need to be compensated with the
boards you send so i'd be keeping them... haha.
Expecting to be ignored,
keith.
<syncbus@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1114714300.381444.89260@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
> Dave, I've traded with you in the past and post openly here- I'm
> surprised someone would label me as "adversarial". Flame wars present
> nohing more than entertainment for the observers and I think I've
> worked too hard for too long to destroy my reputation by taking pot
> shots at a competitor.
>
> Your comments in your post yesterday could be taken the wrong way when
> you point out in all caps about paging through a TEXT list of games, I
> figured it was for emphasis and let it slide instead of ramping up a
> campaign of words that it was a hit against our kit.
>
> I've been aware for weeks that the preliminary version of the Retrocade
> kit borrowed heavily from our kit's code, I didn't post any flames
> since I hadn't seen proof in the final release. I've distributed code
> freely, even copies to update one of our kits owned by the team that
> developed Retrocade, to think that the 96 in 1 code would be used in
> the development of a competing product after being given under the
> guise of a favor is upsetting.
>
> I'm here to promote the 96 in 1, answer questions and provide support,
> I'll correct inaccuracies about my kit when I see them posted and I'd
> expect you'd do the same about your product.
>
> What I won't do is sit back silently when someone post that they were
> "expecting me to be adversarial" about their product when I respond to
> those inaccuracies about my product.
>
> Mike Doyle
>