Why is Norton Worm protection concidered a firewall by XP ??

Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.help_and_support (More info?)

A NAT reuter is not sufficient protection.

I dont understand the rest of the Q

"Son Of Sheep." <sheep.com.au> wrote in message
news:mjhrd1hnbvf8csm0bcsjs6egk3m4888bc3@4ax.com...
>
> This was driving me crazy xp was saying i had a firewall up. Yet i
> only had xp firewall and thatwas turned off. Finaly turned my brain on
> and read the fine print in the windows security centre and it says
> Norton Worm whatever.
>
> Went into norton and turned it off and now my Firewall is off   WOOO
> HOOOOOOO.
>
> Ive got a nat Router so thats all i want or need i would think.
>
> Thanks for any info.
>

Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.help_and_support (More info?)

You need the HARDWARE firewall in the router up and running. (I would
suggest if it is a wireless router to change the password and reconfigure it
to not broadcast SSID and to recognize only your specific MAC#'s). You ALSO
need a SOFTWARE firewall like Norton's (windows XP has one but it only scans
incoming not outgoing traffic like Norton or Zonealarm etc.) Only run ONE
software router however as they may conflict with one another. Does this
help????

Robert


"Son Of Sheep." <sheep.com.au> wrote in message
news:mjhrd1hnbvf8csm0bcsjs6egk3m4888bc3@4ax.com...
>
> This was driving me crazy xp was saying i had a firewall up. Yet i
> only had xp firewall and thatwas turned off. Finaly turned my brain on
> and read the fine print in the windows security centre and it says
> Norton Worm whatever.
>
> Went into norton and turned it off and now my Firewall is off   WOOO
> HOOOOOOO.
>
> Ive got a nat Router so thats all i want or need i would think.
>
> Thanks for any info.
>