Graphics Drawing and Picture Editing

lhgpoobaa

Illustrious
Dec 31, 2007
14,462
1
40,780
we are talking 2D stuff here right?

either is good. both are overkill and even 32mb DDR can handle very high resolutions with high refresh rates.

picture quality... *shrugs*
some swear by the ATI radion... others swear AT it.
my 4mb diamond stealth 2000 had a great picture quality... up to 1024x768. and that was years ago!
as did my ATI 4mb ragepro PCI, and my tnt2, tnt2pro, and my current geforce2pro.

"i love the smell of Overclocking in the morning!" Says my Hamster.
 

pvsurfer

Distinguished
Jan 4, 2001
395
0
18,780
If your not into 3D and games are not your thing, do yourself (and your eyes) a big favor and get a Matrox G450, the very best for 2D image-quality! Furthermore, if you eventually want the niceties of using 2 monitors (as I do with Photoshop), the G450 accomodates that. :smile:
 

SerArthurDayne

Distinguished
Jan 21, 2001
344
0
18,780
Either would do fine in my opinion...

I have an aging Ge2 GTS in my computer, and I really don't see much difference in picture in 2d design than with the AIW I tested.

"Laziness is a talent to be cultivated like any other" - Walter Slovotsky