Sign in with
Sign up | Sign in
Your question

Which Is Better Overall??

Last response: in Graphics & Displays
a b U Graphics card
September 3, 2001 7:39:56 PM

I have a small question,
Which is better? Voodoo3 3000 (16 MB) or geforce2 mx 200 with 32MB ram.
Which will play all games to date and which is better in overall performance.

More about : question

September 3, 2001 8:40:20 PM

The MX.

<font color=red>It is the weakest link. They are not ready yet many have tried and failed with it.</font color=red>
September 4, 2001 10:47:54 PM

Hrmm... probably the MX would have better support. Performance in general might be the same though, considering the MX 200 is a crippled version of an already crippled card. It has something like 1/4 the memory bandwidth of a GTS, and half the memory bandwidth of a MX 400, which is maybe 10 bucks more expensive.

"Laziness is a talent to be cultivated like any other" - Walter Slovotsky
a b U Graphics card
September 5, 2001 11:24:37 AM

What a poor pair to choose from. How about a Radeon LE, MX 400, or the original MX? The MX200 sucks. The voodoo card suck worse. The original MX sucked but only about half as bad as the MX200. The MX400 does about the same as the original MX. And the Radeon LE beets all of them.

Back to you Tom...