Telicus

Distinguished
Sep 19, 2001
49
0
18,530
Hey I just spent all my money on my mobo cpu and ram

Asus p4t
p4 1.5
2x 64 pc 800 no ecc rdram

I don’t have much for a video card now and I need as good as I can get for the money I can get considering my 3d prophets fan fell off just last week and killed my card and my mobo. I am seeing all these 40 50 60$ cards like the Geforce2 MX200 64MB that is about $51 anyone have any suggestions on what cheep card to buy it kills me to say that I hate going cheep on 3d.


"yes I know my enemy they are the teachers that taught me to hate me"
 

rcf84

Splendid
Dec 31, 2007
3,694
0
22,780
Radeon 32mb DDR For $75 of <A HREF="http://www.newegg.com" target="_new">http://www.newegg.com</A>. Is you best choice. GF2 MX400 is trash.

Nice Nvidia and ATi users get a Cookie.... :smile: Yummy :smile:
 

FatBurger

Illustrious
I'm so sick of all the Radeon vs. GeForce crap. Both cards are good. Radeon has better image quality, GeForce has better frame rates. There, done. End of story.

<font color=green>In memory of all the Americans that died 9/11/01
Rest in peace</font color=green>
 

SerArthurDayne

Distinguished
Jan 21, 2001
344
0
18,780
Ignore the ATI fans... A geforce 2 GTS is your best bet for gaming performance/price.

Considering a 90 dollar GTS can thwomp a 150 dollar Radeon 64 in everything but super high resolutions (which nobody uses anyway), it is the best bang for your buck right now. If you pick your card wisely, you can also overclock it far past Pro levels - My GTS has been running highly overclocked for 8 or 9 months straight now. I dunno how long you can afford to wait, but in a month or less the Geforce3 Titanium line and the Radeon 8500's will be out, which should drive down prices all around.

"Laziness is a talent to be cultivated like any other" - Walter Slovotsky
 
G

Guest

Guest
Ignore nvidia fans!

considering an 70 US$ 64 MBs ram kyro 2 video card can beat a GEforce 2 GTS where it matter (high resolutions (more than 800x600), 32 bit)

;)

<P ID="edit"><FONT SIZE=-1><EM>Edited by jabbamerda on 09/22/01 04:21 PM.</EM></FONT></P>
 
G

Guest

Guest
well considering that in some 3dmark2001 scenes software T&L is getting more score than with T&L..

for me is like this :

T&L is a marketing xxxx that provides sells for nvidia chips..
there are no games that trully exploits T&L .
there are things more importnat than T&L (like bandwidth) what is the use to be able to have 300 fps on 640x480x16 if it can't provide better results than a non T&L card in 1024x768x32 ?
I don't care if my cpu is more stressed ... if I am guetting better results than you
;)

not forgeting that in 1280x1024 kyro 2d isn't all blured like most geforce cards..
;)

<P ID="edit"><FONT SIZE=-1><EM>Edited by jabbamerda on 09/24/01 04:45 PM.</EM></FONT></P>