3DMark2001
Tags:
-
Graphics Cards
- Font
-
AMD
-
Intel
-
Graphics
Last response: in Graphics & Displays
AMD_Man
December 8, 2001 4:20:07 PM
Well, before replacing my GeForce2MX-400 with a Radeon 8500 I ran the 3DMark2001 benchmark. I got 3659 on my overclocked GeForce2MX-400 an a 1.33GHz Athlon. I'm curious, what do people usually get with a Geforce2 MX?
BTW, this is at the default 1024*768*32-bits. I'm running my GeForce2MX-400 at 260Mhz/260MHz.
AMD technology + Intel technology = Intel/AMD Pentathlon IV; the <b>ULTIMATE</b> PC processor <P ID="edit"><FONT SIZE=-1><EM>Edited by AMD_Man on 12/08/01 01:23 PM.</EM></FONT></P>
BTW, this is at the default 1024*768*32-bits. I'm running my GeForce2MX-400 at 260Mhz/260MHz.
AMD technology + Intel technology = Intel/AMD Pentathlon IV; the <b>ULTIMATE</b> PC processor <P ID="edit"><FONT SIZE=-1><EM>Edited by AMD_Man on 12/08/01 01:23 PM.</EM></FONT></P>
More about : 3dmark2001
svol
December 8, 2001 4:30:57 PM
AMD_Man
December 8, 2001 5:15:42 PM
Related resources
- 3DMark03 Crashes, but not 3DMark2001? - Forum
- GF3 Ti500 locks up in 3dmark2001 tests and games - Forum
- 3DMark2001 result - Forum
- My quest for 30k 3dmark2001 - Forum
- Upgraded K7S5A CPU - 3DMARK2001 got slower?!? - Forum
Anonymous
a
b
U
Graphics card
December 8, 2001 5:20:36 PM
AMD_Man
December 8, 2001 5:23:10 PM
AMD_Man
December 8, 2001 5:26:00 PM
AMD_Man
December 8, 2001 5:29:21 PM
Stiffler
December 8, 2001 5:31:47 PM
Well I ran the program earlier today and your kicking my score in the nuts
I have a Geforce 2 GTS with a Crystal orb fitted
I only just got the orb and haven't pushed it yet though. I get 3255
Heres the link so you can compare:
<A HREF="http://gamershq.madonion.com/compare2k1.shtml?2173678" target="_new">http://gamershq.madonion.com/compare2k1.shtml?2173678&l...;/A>
Tim
I am Homer of Borg ! Prepare to be... MMMhhhhh Doughnuts
I have a Geforce 2 GTS with a Crystal orb fitted
I only just got the orb and haven't pushed it yet though. I get 3255 Heres the link so you can compare:
<A HREF="http://gamershq.madonion.com/compare2k1.shtml?2173678" target="_new">http://gamershq.madonion.com/compare2k1.shtml?2173678&l...;/A>
Tim
I am Homer of Borg ! Prepare to be... MMMhhhhh Doughnuts
AMD_Man
December 8, 2001 5:40:30 PM
so I was right!!! Way back in June or July, I was saying that SDRAM is more efficient than DDR RAM! Everyone disagreed. I said that my GeForce2MX with memory running at 260MHz could outrun a GeForce2GTS with DDR RAM at 333MHz effective. Everyone disagreed. Using that ratio, a GeForce2MX clocked at 300MHz could outrun a GeForce2 Ultra. Now my question is why isn't nVidia using high-performance SDRAM rather than lower clocked DDR RAM? Which would be cheaper to make? Fast SDRAM or Slow DDR RAM? If my GeForce2 MX had a programmable T&L engine and pixel shaders then if I ran it at 333MHz, it could probably beat a GeForce3 Ti500. Well, why isn't nVidia doing that? But then you'd need 3ns RAM.
AMD technology + Intel technology = Intel/AMD Pentathlon IV; the <b>ULTIMATE</b> PC processor
AMD technology + Intel technology = Intel/AMD Pentathlon IV; the <b>ULTIMATE</b> PC processor
Stiffler
December 8, 2001 6:11:11 PM
AMD_Man
December 8, 2001 6:17:39 PM
Stiffler
December 8, 2001 6:51:51 PM
AMD_Man
December 8, 2001 7:01:16 PM
pr497
December 8, 2001 7:50:03 PM
all the more reason to not buy P4 with SDRAM...
proof...
http://gamershq.madonion.com/compare2k1.shtml?2096468
I don't claim to know anything about everything, I just tell people what I know.
-PSB
proof...
http://gamershq.madonion.com/compare2k1.shtml?2096468
I don't claim to know anything about everything, I just tell people what I know.
-PSB
AMD_Man
December 8, 2001 8:08:57 PM
Stiffler
December 8, 2001 8:09:15 PM
AMD_Man
December 8, 2001 8:18:50 PM
ohh, it works now. I don't know why it wasn't working before. I'm beating you in everything except Fill Rate (Multi-Texturing) and DOT3 Bump Mapping.
Umm, how do I get the url with my scores to give to you?
AMD technology + Intel technology = Intel/AMD Pentathlon IV; the <b>ULTIMATE</b> PC processor <P ID="edit"><FONT SIZE=-1><EM>Edited by AMD_Man on 12/08/01 05:20 PM.</EM></FONT></P>
Umm, how do I get the url with my scores to give to you?
AMD technology + Intel technology = Intel/AMD Pentathlon IV; the <b>ULTIMATE</b> PC processor <P ID="edit"><FONT SIZE=-1><EM>Edited by AMD_Man on 12/08/01 05:20 PM.</EM></FONT></P>
AMD_Man
December 8, 2001 8:22:16 PM
pr497
December 8, 2001 8:45:33 PM
Stiffler
December 8, 2001 8:56:36 PM
AMD_Man
December 8, 2001 9:05:59 PM
<A HREF="http://gamershq.madonion.com/compare2k1.shtml?2175443" target="_new">http://gamershq.madonion.com/compare2k1.shtml?2175443&l...;/A>
AMD technology + Intel technology = Intel/AMD Pentathlon IV; the <b>ULTIMATE</b> PC processor
AMD technology + Intel technology = Intel/AMD Pentathlon IV; the <b>ULTIMATE</b> PC processor
Stiffler
December 8, 2001 10:17:07 PM
AMD_Man
December 8, 2001 10:35:39 PM
A CPU can only affect frame rates if the bottleneck is the CPU not the graphics card. 90% of the tests done by 3DMark2001 are limited by the graphics card and not the CPU. And besides, I've overclocked my GeForce2MX to 260/260. A regular GeForce2MX is 175/166 and a GeForce2MX-400 is normally 200/166. Mine came at 200/200 and 4ns memory. I just added a PCI slot fan to cool the core and the RAM is hardly beyond spec.
AMD technology + Intel technology = Intel/AMD Pentathlon IV; the <b>ULTIMATE</b> PC processor
AMD technology + Intel technology = Intel/AMD Pentathlon IV; the <b>ULTIMATE</b> PC processor
Anonymous
a
b
U
Graphics card
December 9, 2001 12:55:16 AM
AMD_Man
December 9, 2001 1:11:21 AM
Anonymous
a
b
U
Graphics card
December 9, 2001 1:44:30 AM
Yeah, a P4 will not run with SDRAM, am interested to see how they do with DDR. You will like your Radeon, very pretty graphics.Remember you will need DX 8.1 & latest drivers.Get them at www.rage3d.com.
Matisaro
December 9, 2001 3:40:27 AM
Quote:
A CPU can only affect frame rates if the bottleneck is the CPU not the graphics card. 90% of the tests done by 3DMark2001 are limited by the graphics card and not the CPU. And besides, I've overclocked my GeForce2MX to 260/260. A regular GeForce2MX is 175/166 and a GeForce2MX-400 is normally 200/166. Mine came at 200/200 and 4ns memory. I just added a PCI slot fan to cool the core and the RAM is hardly beyond spec. This is not entirely true amdman, a videocard can be asissted by the cpu and the faster your cpu the better the score, the average score for a gf2 pro may be on an average of a 1ghz p3 explaining how your mx400 was able to do so well.
"The Cash Left In My Pocket,The BEST Benchmark"
No Overclock+stock hsf=GOOD!
AMD_Man
December 9, 2001 11:08:28 AM
sdausmus
December 9, 2001 2:56:13 PM
Weird...although I'm beating you by about 3000 points, you actually score HIGHER in the high polygon count tests.
http://gamershq.madonion.com/compare2k1.shtml?2019671
http://gamershq.madonion.com/compare2k1.shtml?2019671
pr497
December 9, 2001 5:46:23 PM
pr497
December 9, 2001 5:46:37 PM
phsstpok
December 9, 2001 11:57:32 PM
I scored 3442 on my Visiontek GTS-V (V for value) at 200/340 (stock is 175/286). That's with a Duron at 1007mhz, 106mhz FSB.
<A HREF="http://gamershq.madonion.com/compare2k1.shtml?2077624" target="_new">http://gamershq.madonion.com/compare2k1.shtml?2077624&l...;/A>
There were no more than 5 scores at Madonion by MX/MX-400 boards paired with Durons that bettered my GTS-V's score so I'm not sorry that I chose it over an MX-400. Besides, it only cost $65 new.
<b>We are all beta testers!</b>
<A HREF="http://gamershq.madonion.com/compare2k1.shtml?2077624" target="_new">http://gamershq.madonion.com/compare2k1.shtml?2077624&l...;/A>
There were no more than 5 scores at Madonion by MX/MX-400 boards paired with Durons that bettered my GTS-V's score so I'm not sorry that I chose it over an MX-400. Besides, it only cost $65 new.
<b>We are all beta testers!</b>
juin
December 10, 2001 4:18:44 AM
They are allready avaible but not to sold there official Date is the 4 january 3 day before northwood.I wonder how much people there will be on the web site when northwood will be release.Maybe 1 000 000.
http://gamershq.madonion.com/products/orb/?publish_comp...
http://gamershq.madonion.com/products/orb/?publish_comp...
pr497
December 10, 2001 6:22:39 AM
Related resources
- Just increased my 3dMark2001 score by 1000! Forum
- Overclocked frequences resests when 3DMArk2001 runs Forum
- 3Dmark2001 on geforce Cards Forum
- 3dmark2001 score supercharged 4000 to 14500 Forum
- why can't I run 3dmark2001 SE? Forum
- 3Dmark2001 SE weak score :( Forum
- 3Dmark2001 slower on XP ? Forum
- 2100vs2400 Barebones 3dMark2001 Forum
- 3DMark2001 and Radeon 9500 Pro Forum
- low score on 3dmark2001 with geforce3 ti200, HELP! Forum
- Geforce 3 perofmrance on 3dmark2001 help please Forum
- 3DMark2001 and the P4 Forum
- Geforce4 Ti4600 in 3dmark2001 Forum
- GeForce2 GTS 3dmark2001 2958 is that too low? Forum
- GeForce 2 Ti (3Dmark2001) Forum
- More resources
Read discussions in other Graphics & Displays categories
!
.
And I am also handicapped by XP