my geforce II sucks

salvop

Distinguished
Jan 27, 2002
1
0
18,510
I have an AMD Athlon 900, VIA KT133 mobo + 384 Meg RAM and a GeForce II MX, yet I only get 2125 3d marks (3d marks 2001). This seems very low given the config. I'm using v21.81 of the detonator drivers.

Any suggestions or is this a normal score?
 

rossyl

Distinguished
Jan 19, 2002
27
0
18,530
I think some of you need to learn how to be a bit more subtle, and less abrupt and rude.

You cannot just tell someone...oh there's is nothing wrong with your card, apart from the fact it sucks.

OK.

Thankyou.

And before you start I do not have a GF2 MX

"If you think too much, you get confused"
 

AMD_Man

Splendid
Jul 3, 2001
7,376
2
25,780
I had a GeForce2MX-400 overclocked to 260MHz/260MHz. It performed about as well as a GeForce2 Pro, but it still sucked. In my opinion, with today's super low pricing, a GeForce2 Ti is the bare minimum for gaming.

AMD technology + Intel technology = Intel/AMD Pentathlon IV; the <b>ULTIMATE</b> PC processor <P ID="edit"><FONT SIZE=-1><EM>Edited by AMD_Man on 01/27/02 04:26 PM.</EM></FONT></P>
 

Flyboy

Distinguished
Dec 31, 2007
737
0
18,980
I have the GeForce2 MX400. I scored 2000 pts with the v21.81 drivers. When I installed the 23.11 drivers I scored 2400. Did you try 23.11 yet?

BTW, I have to agree that the MX versions just plain suck. Guess I got what I payed for...
 

Crashman

Polypheme
Former Staff
You're doing about right, that's about what I got with a PIII 933 and an MX. Actually I think it was 2400, but part of my advantage was that at 933 I was using my ram at 133.

What's the frequency, Kenneth?